Tim Bradley vs Kell Brook

[Mister Wolf]

no he didn't, he won pretty ****ing easy on my card.

I guess my card differs from yours. It was a very competitive fight in which i feel porter was winning in the beginning and Brook by no means dominated. Even the rounds that people have Brook winning were very competitive. My point remains the same that i think Bradley is a much better fighter in all areas than Porter besides power.

[Mister Wolf]

When has Bradley ever looked impressive?

Peterson maybe?

Even when he wins, he looks average or sc****s through the fight or gets a gift decision.

He dominated his last fight in which he took very little damage from Chavez and won on most peoples cards by a large margin. You know this to be a fact unless you want to pull a ***** move and bring up the damage on the side his face that was clearly caused by a clash of heads. Chavez landed and dished out more punishment on Thurman than he did Bradley largely because of Bradley's defensive skills which Porter lacks

[Dirk Diggler UK]

He dominated his last fight in which he took very little damage from Chavez and won on most peoples cards by a large margin. You know this to be a fact unless you want to pull a ***** move and bring up the damage on the side his face that was clearly caused by a clash of heads. Chavez landed and dished out more punishment on Thurman than he did Bradley largely because of Bradley's defensive skills which Porter lacks

I saw the fight and thought he probably should have won but he was hardly impressive. Yet again.

[John Locke]

The Chaves fight was close and competitive, I had Bradley winning 8-4 but he by no means dominated.

[Mister Wolf]

The Chaves fight was close and competitive, I had Bradley winning 8-4 but he by no means dominated.

How is 8-4 close?

[John Locke]

How is 8-4 close?

I think 8-4 is relatively close, add to that all the rounds were competitive and a lot of them could've gone either way, it wasn't a dominant performance by Bradley

[Dirk Diggler UK]

How is 8-4 close?

You thought Brook-Porter was close

[KillerJones]

Everyone on the forum would of said Bradley before Brook beat Porter,now all of a sudden he's the 2nd best welterweight behind Mayweather.the Porter win is seriously overrated,he beat a fighter who to me is a terrible boxer,smothers his own punches and rushes in like a caveman with no technique whatsoever,he can't even throw a decent combination.the Malignaggi win fooled a lot of people into thinking Porter was some monster.Bradley has declined a lot so Brook probably beats him now.

Yea, I don't think much of Porter either. Not that convinced about Brook. He doesn't look bad at all. But the win over Porter wasn't that impressive. I'd like to see him face the other top welters. Hopefully they face each other soon.

[LacedUp]

Kell Brook via stoppage.

[LacedUp]

Bradley is a good little fighter. Strong, relatively quick. Decent movement.

But it would be like a middleweight stepping in with a cruiserweight. Guys like Porter and Bradley think they have edge in inside strength against all welterweights. I would say Porter is physically stronger than Bradley and the first thing out of his mouth after the Brook fight was he was surprised how strong he was.

Brook is a light middleweight. He's too big for someone like Bradley. Once Bradley gets on the inside and feels the strength and getting backed up he'll know. Add to that, he'll quickly know his punches aren't doing anything whilst Brook will repeatedly hurt him with a jab-hook combination.

That's when you start to realize you got yourself in some deep water.