Tim Bradley vs Kell Brook

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Several? Ummmm okay I see it's worthless to argue about Bradley with you because you already have a clear biased agenda.

Right and Handz Groober's comment which I responded to didn't have an agenda?

But we know which one you'll respond to.

[HEND]

Bradley does not box better than Brook.

Yes he does. Why people try to pretend that Brook is a master boxer now? Most of the people only say this because his Porter win where he wasn't even that impressive. He did his job but thar was no masterclass. That was an ugly fight with lots of holding.
Brook is slow as fuck compared to Bradley and Bradley is too slippery. Bradley by UD.
I think Brook is a top 5 ww (as Bradley) but Bradley is a bad style match up to him. He can have a strong phonepole jab but that won't count much if he won't land it on Bradley.

[HEND]

Right and Handz Groober's comment which I responded to didn't have an agenda?

But we know which one you'll respond to.

You have some problem with Bradley, I don't know why. You said he is sloppy too.
He beat Peterson and Alexander, if I remember correctly both of them when they were undefeated and in their prime, he also beat JMM who was on all of the P4P top list around that time and you call him sloppy after that? Smh....

[LacedUp]

Several? Ummmm okay I see it's worthless to argue about Bradley with you because you already have a clear biased agenda.

But he has though. He's also been on the receiving end of a bad decision. And also received a long count once if I remember correctly.

[LacedUp]

Yes he does. Why people try to pretend that Brook is a master boxer now? Most of the people only say this because his Porter win where he wasn't even that impressive. He did his job but thar was no masterclass. That was an ugly fight with lots of holding.
Brook is slow as fuck compared to Bradley and Bradley is too slippery. Bradley by UD.
I think Brook is a top 5 ww (as Bradley) but Bradley is a bad style match up to him. He can have a strong phonepole jab but that won't count much if he won't land it on Bradley.

Because he's a good boxer. He's a fundamentally better boxer than Bradley. Bradley has never looked impressive in any of his big fights, what are you on about? When have you seen Bradley fight and thought "wow this guy is incredible"? never is when. He's always in close, sloppy fights even if his opposition is limited.

Bradley isn't slippery? He's not slick at all. Plus with the size, strength, length, power, reach advantage Brook has, Bradley would have to get inside. I'm sorry, but that would be all Brook.

[RichCCFC]

bump.......

[dan_cov]

Brook still beats the p*ss out of him, last night just further emphasised the fact he would.

[////]

I honestly view Bradley as a slightly better version of Porter. He's a bit more versatile but basically the same limitations. Brook would probably outbox him in a slightly closer fight to the Porter one.

They don't fight alike at all.. Not remotely

How is one a version of the other?

Bradley is a well rounded but featherfisted boxer

Porter is a swarmer caveman

[Dirk Diggler UK]

They don't fight alike at all.. Not remotely

How is one a version of the other?

Bradley is a well rounded but featherfisted boxer

Porter is a swarmer caveman

Bradley swarms like a reckless caveman half the time too. Starts wining wild ass shots and leaves himself wide open up the middle

[mathed]

Bradley gets on the inside and does enough to get the hard earned W.