Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will Cotto's cowardice and the WBC's corruption prevent GGG from unifying 160?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostI do not consider holding TWO titles to be unifying. Unifying the titles requires a fighter to hold all the major titles in a division. When he gets the WBC title, he will become a multiple title holder but not the unified champion. And it says a lot for Golovkin that other 'champions' would rather get stripped or vacate than face him in the ring. I believe that should be noted in the record books beside the name of each fighter who ducks him and vacates their title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingLegend89' View PostRemember the post fight press where thurman was calling out Paulie?
Paulie said: "Its prize fight dummy u better learn that or you will be in awhole lot of trouble."
Freedom, its prize fight dummy. Would u fight Golovkin for 8 millions or Canelo for 15+ millions?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostI do not consider holding TWO titles to be unifying. Unifying the titles requires a fighter to hold all the major titles in a division. When he gets the WBC title, he will become a multiple title holder but not the unified champion. And it says a lot for Golovkin that other 'champions' would rather get stripped or vacate than face him in the ring. I believe that should be noted in the record books beside the name of each fighter who ducks him and vacates their title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aldo5408 View PostUnifying titles is also holding two titles Whether you like it or not. GGG is a unified title holder because he has the ibo title. And the WBA
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostSemantics. I consider a unified title holder to hold all titles. There cannot be multiple unified title holders... There can be only ONE!
2-3 titles = Unified (because the champ "unified" his title with another champ)
4 titles = Undisputed (I dont think ya need a definition for that lol)
GGG isn't a "unified" champion by the way. IBO is not a legitimate, sanctioned title (at least not from what I know of WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO)
GGG is technically, a "belt holder".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostSemantics. I consider a unified title holder to hold all titles. There cannot be multiple unified title holders... There can be only ONE!
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingLegend89' View Postwanna bet all ur points the fight happens? Haters need to be more objective and dont let their emotions control their thinking.
Cotto is a 4th division champ, fighting out of his weight class, meanwhile the true "warriors" like canelo, golovkin, ward rigondeaux are all 1 division champs and u guys are all over their d*cks.
Cotto, like any other new champ, has a voluntary defense which he just took and now hes going for the money fight, Canelo (didnt u guys said he will duck canelo too?)
When Cotto vs GGG gets made all boxingscene (chicanos) posters will forget yall were calling him a coward, diva, chicken.... and ur new threads will be:"cotto will get killed by GGG"
Cotto has FOUGHT EVERY SINGLE MOTHER F8CKER IN HIS GENERATION AND YOU KEYBOARD WARRIORS ONLY KNOW HOW TO HATE.
Cotto fought PEDs Pacquiao and Plaster Margarito... what can scare cotto this late in his career? get real.
Sidenote ~~~~ Hey Brushmyhair, guess what? Cotto will always be a bigger star, better fighter and more accomplished boxer than broner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostI've always wanted to see Golovkin clean out middleweight.
But will Miguel Cotto ever fight him? If he's afraid, why doesn't he just drop the WBC belt?
Comment
Comment