So many Dylan Roof's in this thread.
N'Dam complaining that the ring is too small. 16 x 16 compared to proposed 20 x 20
Collapse
-
Watching contrasting styles is fine, but running and jabbing is not a style, it's not even fighting, its ***** boxing, and it's boring to most people.
And don't give me that "skill" nonsense either. Throwng a dart in the bulls eye is a skill to, but there's a reason no one watches it, it's fcking boring.Comment
-
Comment
-
Thats my whole point, if the ring being smaller changes the fight that drastically to a "one sided beat down "then we would have to consider how great is the fight really? If the ring was enhanced to 24x24, same thing. If it changes the right that drastically then wtf are we really watching?Comment
-
Watching contrasting styles is fine, but running and jabbing is not a style, it's not even fighting, its ***** boxing, and it's boring to most people.
And don't give me that "skill" nonsense either. Throwng a dart in the bulls eye is a skill to, but there's a reason no one watches it, it's fcking boring.
Darts actually attracts a massive audience its probably the #1 sport in Holland and the #2 in the U.K behind football in terms of viewers and the PDC sells out virtually arena.Comment
-
I hate that boxing even has variable ring sizes. There should be a single standard that all pro boxing rings would have to adhere to.Comment
-
Thats my whole point, if the ring being smaller changes the fight that drastically to a "one sided beat down "then we would have to consider how great is the fight really? If the ring was enhanced to 24x24, same thing. If it changes the right that drastically then wtf are we really watching?
Why can't it be the 20 x 20 ring they agreed to? Why does Lemieux need an advantage? Is he not good enough?Comment
-
lol can u imagine if this happened at a pbc event? gbp is so dam dirty and they get a pass 16 by 16 is tinyComment
Comment