Floyd fighting Manny after 5 years when fight could have originally been fought has so little comparison to Leonard fighting Hagler after 5 years.
SRL, however way you spin it, was a great comeback. No tune up fight, and it not being the eye injury only confirm it for you. SRL could have continued to fight in that time.
For me, Floyds whole teasing argument fell down when he said "I gave him [Pacquiao] a chance, up to 14 days out. But my new terms are all the way up to the fight.
Manny agreed to the 14 days months after he said that. Floyd then change his mind. The fight could have taken place Nov 2010 at that point. The whole thing was just posturing. If you are that serious about testing, do it properly, have 6-12 month of OST, its not like neither could not afford it, and of course that begs the question if Floyd was actually clean himself.
Then of course you have this gem:
"Floyd Mayweather Jr., Floyd Mayweather Sr., Roger Mayweather and Mayweather Promotions wish to make it clear that they never intended to claim that Manny Pacquiao has used or is using any performance enhancing drugs, nor are they aware of any evidence that Manny Pacquiao has used performance enhancing drugs. Manny Pacquiao is a great champion, and no one should construe any of our prior remarks as claiming that Manny Pacquiao has used performance enhancing drugs".
This is all i am going to say on PEDS, not going to get dragged into a pointless debate.
Loooooool. Accepting a deal that was off the table months ago? That's like going to a store trying to buy something at the sale price after the sale is over.
Tweet
Comment