Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is next for Gennady Golovkin?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
    Lee-Saunders winner would be okay, as would the winner of Lemieux-N'Jikam.
    If it'll be Saunders no way he fight Golovkin.
    The same is winner of Lemieux-N'Jikam. The winner might want to defend his belt for some time before step up.

    Comment


    • #32
      Heiland would be a good fight. Highly unlikely Lara is next because of haymon and hbo

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Barcham View Post
        Sturm spent years ducking GGG and there is no chance he will have the balls to fight him now. If he did, that fight would have already been made.

        Lemieux may fight GGG but N'Dam never will. And Lemieux would need Oscar's permission.

        Forget about any Haymon fighter on HBO.
        Originally posted by Barcham View Post
        Look at the vid I posted in post 5 above. You won't be seeing Saunders or Eubank in the ring with GGG any time soon.
        That leaves us with our lord and saviour Sergio Mora.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
          Hope not but smaller underdogs like Froch find it too risky, cause G punches like a mule
          Enough with this nonsense. Froch isn't fighting anyone because he's at the end of his career and probably going to retire. He's not scared of some favour of the month MW who hasn't beaten anybody.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
            Enough with this nonsense. Froch isn't fighting anyone because he's at the end of his career and probably going to retire. He's not scared of some favour of the month MW who hasn't beaten anybody.
            Yeah I'll take you on your word, and ignore what Froch said himself lol

            “Just swerve Golovkin like the plague. He punches like a mule. I don’t need to be in with him. Dangerous fight.”

            "It was tongue in cheek back then. I was being a bit cheeky and you can take those comments with a pinch of salt. What I will say though is this guy can ****ing punch: he's dangerous and if he can be avoided we'll avoid him. I'll stand by that and I don't give a ****."

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Boxfan83 View Post
              Actually he should fight Jorge Sebastian Heiland but he'll probably fight Sam Soliman & his fans will say everyone was ducking so soliman was his best option.
              Soliman vs Geale has potential to be ppv in Australia, it won't be Soliman.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Boxfan83 View Post
                Actually he should fight Jorge Sebastian Heiland but he'll probably fight Sam Soliman & his fans will say everyone was ducking so soliman was his best option.
                Soliman's already booked for a fight

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Shpacman View Post
                  If it'll be Saunders no way he fight Golovkin.
                  The same is winner of Lemieux-N'Jikam. The winner might want to defend his belt for some time before step up.
                  That's probably true.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                    Yeah I'll take you on your word, and ignore what Froch said himself lol

                    ***8220;Just swerve Golovkin like the plague. He punches like a mule. I don***8217;t need to be in with him. Dangerous fight.***8221;

                    "It was tongue in cheek back then. I was being a bit cheeky and you can take those comments with a pinch of salt. What I will say though is this guy can ****ing punch: he's dangerous and if he can be avoided we'll avoid him. I'll stand by that and I don't give a ****."
                    You keep on repeating the same quotes that were admittedly said in jest but you've purposefully redacted the end were he said he would fight Golovkin for the right money.

                    The bottom line is we have no idea what is or is not going on behind the scenes in negociations.

                    Personally, I'm far more willing to give Froch the benefit of the doubt. Froch is after all, the far more proven commodity who has consistently faced competition that is better than anyone GGG has entered the ring with to date in the professional ranks.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      2 years ago GGG was a complete nobody and Carl was fighting Kessler II and Groves I.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP