Froch never mentions Kovalev or Stevenson..Why?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yoz
    Yoz
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 8617
    • 439
    • 427
    • 16,868

    #31
    Originally posted by -Kev-
    Why does Froch have to mention any one at all? I'm tired of proven fighters who are at the tail end of their careers getting questioned as if they didn't already put in work years ago. Dude is like what, 38 now? His last 5 fighters faced were undefeated Ward, undefeated Bute, Mack(a break fight), Kessler, and undefeated Groves. He doesn't have to mention any one anymore. The 5 before that were Kessler, Dirrell, Abraham, Johnson, Taylor. What now he has to fight Stevenson or Kovalev to satisfy you? In his last 11 fights, one of them was against an obvious easy fighter which was Mack, that's about it.
    This ^^^^^^^.

    Great post.

    Comment

    • Reigning Champ
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 268
      • 22
      • 12
      • 9,458

      #32
      Because he's a super middleweight.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP