Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who else thinks less of GGG after Cottos performance tonight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
    What a strange conclusion to come to. Golovkin destroyed Geale first when Geale had never been stopped before. Geale hasn't fought since, had to weigh 157 pounds and looked worse than he ever did. Cotto was fighting Geale coming off a KO loss to Golovkin. What did you guys expect, a competitive fight?
    yup nothing more to add

    TS inform yourself before posting

    /thread

    Comment


    • #42
      Can't ignore the fact that Cotto would have not fought had the Geale that fought GGG weighed in.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Jubei View Post
        yup nothing more to add

        TS inform yourself before posting

        /thread
        Except for the fact that he was coming off of a win... not a loss. This guy lol.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
          Except for the fact that he was coming off of a win... not a loss. This guy lol.
          I said GGG knocked out Geale before Cotto fought him. Fighters that get knocked out by GGG arent the same, specially not a weight drained zombie Geale.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Jubei View Post
            I said GGG knocked out Geale before Cotto fought him. Fighters that get knocked out by GGG arent the same, specially not a weight drained zombie Geale.
            You didn't say that at all... You said /end thread about completely wrong information. You somehow had to justify the GGG win for some reason simply because I said Geale fought again after the GGG loss.

            No need to be that insecure about GGG.

            Comment


            • #46
              The catchweight will take away from Cotto's performance either way. It doesn't matter how how well he out boxed Geale. That is what they asked for so it is what it is.

              To me he looked great. He looked as good as Golovkin did. He is best against that type of fighter. I still think GGG and Canelo beat Him.

              Comment


              • #47
                Weight drained, and already killed by GGG, and Cotto head butted poor Geale, that was how he got hurt.

                GGG will seriously put the h0m0 rican in a coma. The dirty Rican should never face GGG.

                I also fear for his safety against Canelo. Mexico will always rule PR. Remember that.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
                  Except for the fact that he was coming off of a win... not a loss. This guy lol.


                  Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
                  You didn't say that at all... You said /end thread about completely wrong information. You somehow had to justify the GGG win for some reason simply because I said Geale fought again after the GGG loss.

                  No need to be that insecure about GGG.

                  Completely wrong information? Lol

                  Who cares if one piece of information was incorrect he still got destroyed by Golovkin and had to weigh 157 against Cotto and looked bad in the ring.

                  This thread is a real head scratcher. Golovkin had a very easy time knocking out Geale, he did it first when Geale was a top 5 middleweight and at 160. This thread would only make sense if Golovkin struggled with Geale or Cotto knocked him out faster, neither of which happened.

                  It's pointless talking about Golovkin vs Cotto because it's clear Cotto has no intentions of fighting the man.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Jubei View Post
                    I said GGG knocked out Geale before Cotto fought him. Fighters that get knocked out by GGG arent the same, specially not a weight drained zombie Geale.
                    ^this^ & if Geale was a shot fighter after ggg he would've looked like Guerrero did today against a gimme opponent but Geale won his fight after ggg handily. Geale quits before he takes full punishment. Geale isn't that good but with this win, Cottos short 160 resume is still better than GGGs...

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
                      Completely wrong information? Lol

                      Who cares if one piece of information was incorrect he still got destroyed by Golovkin and had to weigh 157 against Cotto and looked bad in the ring.

                      This thread is a real head scratcher. Golovkin had a very easy time knocking out Geale, he did it first when Geale was a top 5 middleweight and at 160. This thread would only make sense if Golovkin struggled with Geale or Cotto knocked him out faster, neither of which happened.

                      It's pointless talking about Golovkin vs Cotto because it's clear Cotto has no intentions of fighting the man.
                      I made this thread because Geale actually landed on ggg & showed some boxing skill against ggg. We all know & admit ggg destroyed Geale, that's not up for debate. What is, is Cotto just looked better doing so, he boxed better & he never got hit clean once unlike ggg. It's funny, right when cotto KO'd Geale in the 4th, I knew ggg fans would say, "well ggg did it in the 3rd." Lol! I'm not even a Cotto lover but it only took Cotto 2 KD's to make Geale quit, it took 3 for GGG lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP