Comments Thread For: Warren: Brook, Hearn Talking Arrant Nonsense on Khan

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scipio2009
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2014
    • 13741
    • 276
    • 64
    • 98,172

    #31
    Originally posted by English Lion
    Are you actually that daft to think that Hearn has the power to stop Sky Sports generating revenue just because he hates Khan? Lmao...do you honestly think if the Khan Vs Mayweather fight was made, he could just click his fingers and say "sorry but i'm going to block Khan and Mayweather from sky box office, just because i dislike him and i don't care how many millions you will lose". Your Anti-Khan hatred has become that strong that you starting to sound desperate.
    Matchroom Sport seems to have an exclusive deal to broadcast fights on Sky Sports. If you can show me a fight card that's been on Sky that wasn't at least "in association with Matchroom Sport", I'll leave it alone.

    Still, even beyond that, why would Sky Sports spend the money on a fight with Khan, knowing that he's not committed to the network in any meaningful way and that, from the look of things, the rest of his fights will likely air on Box Nation?

    At least in the case of Kell Brook, win or lose but as long as he holds his own, Sky Sports continues on with a fighter that their audience has seen develop and a fighter whose career would then continue on with Sky Sports, be it on the regular Sky Channel or Box Office (he's still good enough to give any other welterweight on the planet utter hell).

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP