Comments Thread For: Shaw: He is Overlooking Geale, Cotto is No Golovkin!

[bigjavi973]

I'm in other threads too. I rarely see you Cotto fans there.

Hey! I post in non-Cotto threads!!! lol

[Alpha & Omega]

I think people are underestimating Geale a bit. He's a solid fighter. Will he beat Cotto? Prob not but wouldn't surprise me I guess. Sure Geale was demolished by GGG but I mean who isn't GGG demolishing lol? 20 straight KO's I mean cmon. Problem is it may go the distance and there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that an Aussie will be given a decision over a PR at MSG lol.

[Fantasiabruja]

I think people are underestimating Geale a bit. He's a solid fighter. Will he beat Cotto? Prob not but wouldn't surprise me I guess. Sure Geale was demolished by GGG but I mean who isn't GGG demolishing lol? 20 straight KO's I mean cmon. Problem is it may go the distance and there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that an Aussie will be given a decision over a PR at MSG lol.

Just a little problem with your scenario the fight is at the Barclay center.

[Fantasiabruja]

It's true. They just slurp off cotto and then get mad at other Ricans for being objective.

You are not PR and if you were even if you don't like Cotto you wouldn't be jumping at every chance to put down another PR fan and posting negative shi* about the island. I'm not big on Garcia but I don't side with his haters neither or defend him, I just read and move on that's being objective.

[Fantasiabruja]

You worship Cotto don't you?

I'm a loyal fan, what's your excuse for your obsession with the guy?

[////]

All people are talking about is Golovkin. This fight is "the guy who ducked Golovkin vs the guy Golovkin destroyed". It's like Cotto is fighting on Golovkin's undercard.

Miguel "Too Famous to Fight You" Cotto's blood must be boiling.

[////]

You are not PR and if you were even if you don't like Cotto you wouldn't be jumping at every chance to put down another PR fan and posting negative shi* about the island. I'm not big on Garcia but I don't side with his haters neither or defend him, I just read and move on that's being objective.

I don't think you know what "objective" means.

That's like saying a cop letting you out of a ticket because you're a ***y woman and he likes those is "objective".

[PeasantCrusha]

The only people talking about golovkin are Bandwagon types who think GGG's resume is awesome. The same bandwagon team that a year back were uttering silly shyt like "Matty is a machine doe..." Fans with NO countrymen of their own to cheer for so they LATCH onto guys like GGG.

Now, this notion that because Geale lost a fight, it makes him unworthy of ever fighting again... What does that make GGG wanting to fight Cotto then? Did Cotto not lose to Manny? Trout? So is GGG somehow a badass for wanting to fight an ex Jr. Welter who LOST 4 times already to SMALLER opposition?


Silly peasants...


I must break you..

[PeasantCrusha]

I'm a loyal fan, what's your excuse for your obsession with the guy?

Same here. Loyal til the end. The same loyalty that peasants showed a plaster cheat named Tony. Yet they act as if being a loyal fan, the direct opposite of a bandwagon ship jumping poser "fan," is a bad thing. They just hate that they have to answer for their silly opinions.

[Fantasiabruja]

I don't think you know what "objective" means.

I was referring to my neutrality in the Garcia case. In his case I would be able to be objective if I were to have a conversation about him because un like with Cotto have no loyalty for him as a fan. In reference to Cotto I never claimed to be objective I'm always too busy defending the guy against his haters. Blanco on the other hand hates Cotto and his fans and never says a positive thing about the guy so he can't possibly be objective. Another example I don't like Mayweather but I believe he is the best boxer of this generation.