It was a rhetorical question really.
If the gloves were already banned then I can see why the stipulation was added but as things stand imo Hearn shouldn't be giving stipulation on what gloves to wear on the basis of what he thinks might happen.
If he has a firm date for the ban taking place prior to an August bout then again then fair enough.
Why do you think Bradley wants to fight Brook? Arum will play Top Rank round robin with that WBO belt.
If the gloves were already banned then I can see why the stipulation was added but as things stand imo Hearn shouldn't be giving stipulation on what gloves to wear on the basis of what he thinks might happen.
If he has a firm date for the ban taking place prior to an August bout then again then fair enough.
Why do you think Bradley wants to fight Brook? Arum will play Top Rank round robin with that WBO belt.
Comment