GGG vs Froch at a catchweight???

[PK3434]

No catch weight but it wouldn't surprise me if Froch asked for it to be at 170. He doesn't have a belt anymore and has been off for a while.

[HitmanHattonAY]

this fight has to be at 168 !

[GRIP STACCIN]

this fight has to be at 168 !

that gril in ur avatar ****ing,,dam she got me shivering

[kafkod]

Calling bull. No sources or anything. Tom already said it's going to take place at 168 if it happens.

OK, Mr Tom Loeffler says( via text) that in regards to a Froch fight, GGG(they) are willing to go to 168 and the UK #boxing

— Steve Kim (@steveucnlive) May 21, 2015

Those Egoboxing videos are all bull****.

You would be better asking your missus for her opinion than listening to anything that guy says.

[xhiddenx87]

Dont know if it is true, but I would prefer to wait for the fight to be done, then hace wn opinión about it. I will prefer the fight at 168 though.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Desperate Cotto fan...

[Evil Abed]

I told Eddie clearly it would be 168 because of the respect to Carl and the marketability he brings with him https://t.co/OnMCrstwNJ

— Tom Loeffler (@TomLoeffler1) June 3, 2015

Tom responding to this rumor

[i'm a fun haver]

Abel Sanchez has said in multiple interviews that he does not like catchweights.
They would fight Ward at 168 for his title and they will go to the UK n fight Froch at 168.
I'm sure they would have to play ball with Canelo or Cotto and agree to a garbage can CW to fight either one of them, if they ever decide to step up.

[Legacy]

Not my cup of tea, I prefer the technical boxers with skill and method to their madness. These guys appeal more to that UFC/heavy metal crowd.

[Eastcoast]

Who's the more desperate hater: Ego for making this shit up or Bigjavi for trying to propagate it?

Sounds like Ego won't even respond to people on this.