PBC on Spike: Entire telecast averaged 772k viewers and a 0.3 adults 18-49 rating

[Fruit]

LOL at these numbers being described as "huge". 1 million on SPIKE is merely decent numbers.

[talz]

Of course he does, don't be silly. Pacquiao would retire on his stool after taking a few stiff chocolate brownie right hands.



But Brook did do the same numbers vs Porter on Showtime?

I don't know Spike TV at all - but I gather it's terrestrial right? Or cable or whatever.

I might be wrong, but it doesn't sound like a lot to me, especially as Khan was nearly doubling that figure on HBO 4-5 years ago.

No Brook-Porter did like 500k on showtime, like the lowest of the year or something pathetic like that. The guy just made 200k and it was PPV in UK whilst Khan is making 1.5m from US tv alone excluding UK and world wide revenue.

[HanzGruber]

Of course he does, don't be silly. Pacquiao would retire on his stool after taking a few stiff chocolate brownie right hands.



But Brook did do the same numbers vs Porter on Showtime?

I don't know Spike TV at all - but I gather it's terrestrial right? Or cable or whatever.

I might be wrong, but it doesn't sound like a lot to me, especially as Khan was nearly doubling that figure on HBO 4-5 years ago.

brook porter avg 660,000

It's just obvious to see what your motivation is for suddenly leaping to Khan's defence and vigorously attacking Brook.

It's because you're covering your bases in case Mayweather picks Khan. You're too easy to read, worse than Dunn in terms of being a Mayweather/Haymontard.

What's my motivation? I've always been a fan of both, I haven't just become a Brook fan. In fact, if anything I was more a Khan fan. I picked him to beat Brook when the fight was mooted. I'm just calling it like I see it.

You are one cheeky **** mate I swear. This has nothing to do with floyd. Khan was an option for floyd last year wasn't he? And I was shltting on khan and making fun of him then lol. Tell me again how I'm trying to boost khan up. I'm a khan tard but call him biscuit chin..

[FrankieBruno]

Of course he does, don't be silly. Pacquiao would retire on his stool after taking a few stiff chocolate brownie right hands.



But Brook did do the same numbers vs Porter on Showtime?

I don't know Spike TV at all - but I gather it's terrestrial right? Or cable or whatever.

I might be wrong, but it doesn't sound like a lot to me, especially as Khan was nearly doubling that figure on HBO 4-5 years ago.

Brook vs Porter did 661K, on a Saturday on Showtime

Danny Garcia vs. Rod Salka did 800k

As Dan Rafael pointed out Brook vs Porter was a ratings tank for ShowTime

and as Dan Rafael just pointed out on twitter, Khan vs Algieri was a ratings hit on Spike

[SalimShady1212]

Of course he does, don't be silly. Pacquiao would retire on his stool after taking a few stiff chocolate brownie right hands.



But Brook did do the same numbers vs Porter on Showtime?

I don't know Spike TV at all - but I gather it's terrestrial right? Or cable or whatever.

I might be wrong, but it doesn't sound like a lot to me, especially as Khan was nearly doubling that figure on HBO 4-5 years ago.

That's the highest numbers they've ever had for boxing and it's very good from what I'm seeing from Twitter journalists. Pacquiao's left hand would beg to differ. Mayweather said he sets trap for everyone else but me and can see why he's such a great fighter.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Comparing ratings instead of comparing the two fighters in the ring.

More **** measuring competitions from the Khantards

[FrankieBruno]

Comparing ratings instead of comparing the two fighters in the ring.

More **** measuring competitions from the Khantards

Its the Eddie Hern way

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No Brook-Porter did like 500k on showtime, like the lowest of the year or something pathetic like that. The guy just made 200k and it was PPV in UK whilst Khan is making 1.5m from US tv alone excluding UK and world wide revenue.

Not as pathetic as this, Talz.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=658181&page=152

[LacedUp]

Doubling 1.2 were are you getting your numbers from? Dude Kell brook was petrified to fight Bradley no way he has the balls to fight pac

They avg. 700k right? He did 1.2 ish vs Malignaggi and Judah on HBO back in the day.

No Brook-Porter did like 500k on showtime, like the lowest of the year or something pathetic like that. The guy just made 200k and it was PPV in UK whilst Khan is making 1.5m from US tv alone excluding UK and world wide revenue.

It did 660 that's pretty close to what Khan just averaged.

Where the *** did you get 200k from? He made $700k dollars from the Porter fight and now he's on PPV. Don't be a ****** just because you're a khanturd.

brook porter avg 660,000

Exactly, how is that much worse than avg 770?

Brook vs Porter did 661K, on a Saturday on Showtime

Danny Garcia vs. Rod Salka did 800k

As Dan Rafael pointed out Brook vs Porter was a ratings tank for ShowTime

and as Dan Rafael just pointed out on twitter, Khan vs Algieri was a ratings hit on Spike

It might have been. I'm not too familiar with the different channels. But the numbers were pretty equal?

Let's not forget that Brook made his debut against someone who had only fought on showtime 3 times before I believe. Khan has been on HBO and Showtime for 6 years + was fighting a guy who just fought Pacquiao on HBO PPV.

I don't see how you can say Khan is such a massive pull when doing 770k.

[SalimShady1212]

Comparing ratings instead of comparing the two fighters in the ring.

More **** measuring competitions from the Khantards

I'm worried about how many times you mention ****, whatever makes you happy.