Comments Thread For: Hearn: Mayweather Won't Go Near Brook - Too Risky!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • punchr
    get-up-and-go
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2013
    • 4188
    • 254
    • 621
    • 61,418

    #11
    Originally posted by HMICHMIC
    I wouldent mind a brooks vs mayweather I tell you I rather see that instead of thurmn, or khan
    Not Khan. Khan has looked terrible in his recent fights.

    Comment

    • IIG
      Woo Pig Sooie!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 4917
      • 111
      • 341
      • 35,275

      #12
      That's a real fight. I would expect Floyd to win, but he'd have to work for it.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30552
        • 2,201
        • 930
        • 105,596

        #13
        This is why Floyds zero means nothing and he certainly isn't the best ever, let alone this era, when the Brooks of this world are considered too risky?

        Brook didn't know if hed even be able to fight again 2 fights ago after being stabbed in the leg! So khan would be the lesser of the two evils.

        Comment

        • RED REP
          LEFT HOOK FROM HELL
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 1397
          • 72
          • 2
          • 7,879

          #14
          Originally posted by punchr
          Mayweather doesn't fight black fighters. I'm sorry it's true. The last time he fought another Moor he almost got knocked the **** out. Fact.
          He almost took a count, that's all. His recovery is second to non. Ain't no old ass shame Mosley knocking Floyd out. GTFOH.

          Comment

          • thack
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 12886
            • 2,936
            • 1,340
            • 53,931

            #15
            One thing is for sure Floyd would be applauded for taking on the undefeated IBF champion and would now be laughed at were he to fight Khan, no form no fight.
            It will be interesting to see how Porter / Broner pans out but Kell has already made a name for himself stateside by beating Porter, if Porter were to win big then there might be good interest for a Floyd v Brook fight.
            For those who fail to see it Khan is now outside looking in and things may get even worst, he may actually have to fight some one ......he's been bubbled !

            Comment

            • JHAVIS
              Interim Champion
              • May 2006
              • 640
              • 27
              • 0
              • 6,972

              #16
              Originally posted by hugh grant
              This is why Floyds zero means nothing and he certainly isn't the best ever, let alone this era, when the Brooks of this world are considered too risky?

              Brook didn't know if hed even be able to fight again 2 fights ago after being stabbed in the leg! So khan would be the lesser of the two evils.
              Dude, Floyd is the best of the era.

              Comment

              • oneon11
                Interim Champion
                • Apr 2013
                • 758
                • 62
                • 0
                • 6,877

                #17
                Someone tell me this, when Floyd fights these guys and make them look like amateur's how come he is never given credit? All I hear is Floyd won't fight this or that guy and when he beats them a laundry of excuses are all you clowns can come up with instead showing respect.

                Comment

                • SalimShady1212
                  Head Of Team Matthysse
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2015
                  • 3972
                  • 156
                  • 488
                  • 11,485

                  #18
                  Lol next joke please. Aint nobody beating Floyd.

                  Comment

                  • Suckmedry
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 5558
                    • 321
                    • 201
                    • 7,267

                    #19
                    Mayweather-Brook is such a better fight. Khan a bit faster than Brook but Brook has the power to make things interesting plus he isn't packing glass

                    Comment

                    • raymosr
                      Interim Champion
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 542
                      • 39
                      • 0
                      • 6,622

                      #20
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      This is why Floyds zero means nothing and he certainly isn't the best ever, let alone this era, when the Brooks of this world are considered too risky?

                      Brook didn't know if hed even be able to fight again 2 fights ago after being stabbed in the leg! So khan would be the lesser of the two evils.
                      Hey Dichead, was it Mayweather that said that a fight with brooks would be too risky or was Kell Brook's *PROMOTER* that said it? Mayweather has fought Cotto, Canelo, & Pacquaio... I highly doubt he sees ant that in Brooks. Brooks has only beaten fckn Porter, other than that he hasn't faced anyone but tomato cans; just like his recent fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP