The winner of the fight can talk as much **** as he wants to... That is the height of arrogance to say Mayweather shouldn't say anything about the win because their fighter wasn't 100%. Whose fault was that? That is almost as dumb as claiming a one armed Pacquiao actually won the fight when we all saw him fighting with both arms.
Hasn't Manny Pacquiao always been a one-handed fighter lololol.
Every fighter has a dominant hand but obviuosly to beat a guy like Floyd you need all the tools in the bag. It's not like Pacquiao doesn't set up all his shots with right hook and jab, etc.
People paid for the fight because they thought Manny had a chance due to his overwhelming media hype machine. He used both his arms through the whole fight.
People paid for the fight because they thought Manny had a chance due to his overwhelming media hype machine. He used both his arms through the whole fight.
Maidana>>>Pacquiao
you raise a most excellent point
fools went emo because the guy the wanted to do well couldn't do ****
meanwhile Marcos and Miguel were able to do something
the media only wets its panties when a politically correct, clean cut guy who can push their agenda does well
Exactly, but so many Mayweather ball lickers dont even think so. They are strung high over Mayweather fighting the Pacman. Regardless of the UD, 80-90% know that the Pacman really was the one who won.
what are you talking the only people i see saying pac won are his fans. How come no media outlet are saying it was a robbery
Tweet
Comment