Comments Thread For: Cotto: I Have Nothing To Prove To Canelo or Golovkin

[Craveman]

" hold on " ?

You mean, earn a living ?

Most likely, yep ^^

And BTW kid, the tears in your silly little cut-n-paste reply were delicious

So you're saying he's holding on to a belt that don't mean anything but it helps him to earn a living? Sounds wrong lol.

[Craveman]

Craveman.....

It is funny to see you sucking off Hypekin, and crying because Hypekin cannot pad his record with a fighter that I dont take seriously at the weight.

Cotto should fight Mayweather in September, Canelo next year, and then retire.

Who cares about whether his MW belt is on the line or not, because neither Mayweather or Canelo are middleweights.

He should not offer a payday to Hypekin.

Hypekin should make his own way, with legit achievements, like Cotto did.

I don't care what you say or believe. I'm just explaining others on this thread by using you as example how Cotto is ducking Golovkin.

Like I said Cotto wants to hold onto the belt and he still is. So it means he cares.

IT DOES MATTER if middleweight belts are on the line because like you said Cotto isn't a true middleweight and if those guys beat him. They are not winning the belts the right way are they?

[aboutfkntime]

I find it really ****** that you don't take it serious care about Cotto fighting at middleweight with belts on the line. You know he can lose to Geale next week.

Exactly !

I do not take seriously, a guy who is clearly not a middleweight, fighting at middleweight..... and why should I ?

You are the moron who seems to think that ABC belts are important.

So you admit the "legendary" Cotto is just another **** name in a resume?

I admit that Cotto is not a meaningful scalp for a supposed " killer " at 160.

So, I cant undersatand why you are crying about it.

But your tears are delicious nonetheless

[Craveman]

Exactly !

I do not take seriously, a guy who is clearly not a middleweight, fighting at middleweight..... and why should I ?

You are the moron who seems to think that ABC belts are important.



I admit that Cotto is not a meaningful scalp for a supposed " killer " at 160.

So, I cant undersatand why you are crying about it.

But your tears are delicious nonetheless

Then Cotto should drop the belts because he isn't worthy of it.

And tell me why did Cotto fought for the belt? Is he a moron for going for the unimportant belt?

[aboutfkntime]

So you're saying he's holding on to a belt that don't mean anything but it helps him to earn a living? Sounds wrong lol.

Belts are worthless, and have been for a long time now.

Only casual fans need a roadmap to tell them who the best fighter is in each division.

You silly kid, tell me where the WBC rank Wladimir Klitschko at HW.....
..... and then tell me why I should take them, and you, seriously ?

BTW, you are two posts away from skulking out of here with your tail between your legs, just saying.....

Ive been there done that with casual fans like you.

[aboutfkntime]

Then Cotto should drop the belts because he isn't worthy of it.

And tell me why did Cotto fought for the belt? Is he a moron for going for the unimportant belt?

If you think that SRL is a genuine LHW champion, you are a fool.

Lets leave it there.....

Reply to my earlier comment, you have two posts left.....

[PeasantCrusha]

Exactly !

I do not take seriously, a guy who is clearly not a middleweight, fighting at middleweight..... and why should I ?

You are the moron who seems to think that ABC belts are important.



I admit that Cotto is not a meaningful scalp for a supposed " killer " at 160.

So, I cant undersatand why you are crying about it.

But your tears are delicious nonetheless

I am with you when it comes to these trinkets. I just like to see competitive fights. GGGs quest for a belt, as if beating an ex jr welter, is not what being the "middleweight champion" is all about.

The GGG crew is setting the bar low if all we ever here is how the little guy is terrified and will be destroyed easily by GGG. I would be depressed if beating on an aging/smaller opponent, was the highlight of my favorite fighter's career.

[aboutfkntime]

I am with you when it comes to these trinkets. I just like to see competitive fights and GGGs quest for a belt, as if beating an ex jr welter, is what being the "middleweight champion" is all about.

The GGG crew is setting the bar low if all we ever here is how the little guy is terrified and will be destroyed easily by GGG. I would be depressed if beating on an aging/smaller opponent, was the highlight of my favorite fighter's career.

These asshats are crying about meaningful fights, and attempting to use ABC belts as justification.

Hypekin is a supposed killer, with a shht resume'..... and yet these asshats are trying to insinuate that little-ol-Cotto is a meaningful scalp at 160, just because he holds a SDFKLJGHFDSGLK belt.

Still waiting for Caveman to tell me why the WBC dont rate Klitschko, and why I should rate him

[bigjavi973]

That article, like most here, is pitifully incomplete and lacking details. Sulaiman himself changes what he says from interview to interview, one he says that a signed guarantee is required and in others he only states that the winner must fight GGG.

I would not trust a word the guy says right now. He is trying to please everyone at the same time and comes off looking like a fool. As long as Cotto is allowed to do whatever he wants, WBC comes off looking amateurish and unprofessional.

Agreed here. WBC has been showing their true colors.

[aboutfkntime]

OK, a different tack.....

If Golovkin beat Cotto at 160.......

Who would be Golovkins best win ?

Who ?