Comments Thread For: Cotto: I Have Nothing To Prove To Canelo or Golovkin

[Barcham]

http://www.boxingscene.com/sulaiman-...ace-ggg--91259

Nowhere in the article does is state that there "must be a written guarantee for the winner to fight GGG".

It does say that the winner of the Cotto-Canelo fight is "obligated" to fight GGG next.

But like I said previously its the WBC so what else do you expect.

That article, like most here, is pitifully incomplete and lacking details. Sulaiman himself changes what he says from interview to interview, one he says that a signed guarantee is required and in others he only states that the winner must fight GGG.

I would not trust a word the guy says right now. He is trying to please everyone at the same time and comes off looking like a fool. As long as Cotto is allowed to do whatever he wants, WBC comes off looking amateurish and unprofessional.

[Craveman]

Also, kayod.....

I consider myself very knowledgable regarding weight, weight manipulation.

The trend of blurring lines between divisons is lowering the standards within boxing, I have been very vocal about that, so your earlier comment "interests" me.

In fact, it more than interests me.

I would very much like to spend a lot of time discussing this with you, and today happens to be good for me.

I just dont take Cotto seriously at middleweight, he clearly isnt one, and he is not that far away from retirement..... so its no big deal to me.

Lets start with Pacquiaos career.....

There are two reasons why I suggest that we start with Pacquiao 1) because he is the best recent example of blatant weight manipulation 2) because my pac-tardation radar is bleeping loudly.

I am very interested in discussing manny-weight, because that will enable me to see how seriously you take your - most likely adjustable - standards.

Before we examine the 5 fights in question, lets quickly discuss one other.....

What do you think of Pacs win over Hoya ?

How highly do you rate that win ?

How much credit do you give Manny ?

You completely missed an obvious point, and you did it intentionally, just to win a debate...... you made a BIG deal out of the catchweight, to minimise Cottos potential win/loss..... and you did it to make Hypekin appear to have a significantly better resume, despite beating the exact same fkn guy......way to miss the point genius.

Hypekin is regarded as a killer, and has 9 years at 160 under his belt.

Not only is Cotto not a killer, he is not even a middleweight..... so the fact that you are quibbling over a catchweight, instead of giving me a HUGE list of superior names that Hypekin has beaten..... is pathetic, and tells the whole story.

Lets have that weight-debate now..... we can get back to Golovkin/Cotto.

Of course Cotto is serious about being a middleweight because he wanted to win his fourth weight title there. Your opinion doesn't matter here.

He is clearly a middleweight as long he weighs and fight within the division. As for not being so far from retirement doesn't give him the rights to abuse his power to keep the belts.

[Craveman]

Also, kayod.....

I consider myself very knowledgable regarding weight, weight manipulation.

The trend of blurring lines between divisons is lowering the standards within boxing, I have been very vocal about that, so your earlier comment "interests" me.

In fact, it more than interests me.

I would very much like to spend a lot of time discussing this with you, and today happens to be good for me.

I just dont take Cotto seriously at middleweight, he clearly isnt one, and he is not that far away from retirement..... so its no big deal to me.

Lets start with Pacquiaos career.....

There are two reasons why I suggest that we start with Pacquiao 1) because he is the best recent example of blatant weight manipulation 2) because my pac-tardation radar is bleeping loudly.

I am very interested in discussing manny-weight, because that will enable me to see how seriously you take your - most likely adjustable - standards.

Before we examine the 5 fights in question, lets quickly discuss one other.....

What do you think of Pacs win over Hoya ?

How highly do you rate that win ?

How much credit do you give Manny ?

You completely missed an obvious point, and you did it intentionally, just to win a debate...... you made a BIG deal out of the catchweight, to minimise Cottos potential win/loss..... and you did it to make Hypekin appear to have a significantly better resume, despite beating the exact same fkn guy......way to miss the point genius.

Hypekin is regarded as a killer, and has 9 years at 160 under his belt.

Not only is Cotto not a killer, he is not even a middleweight..... so the fact that you are quibbling over a catchweight, instead of giving me a HUGE list of superior names that Hypekin has beaten..... is pathetic, and tells the whole story.

Lets have that weight-debate now..... we can get back to Golovkin/Cotto.

Of course Cotto is serious about being a middleweight because he wanted to win his fourth weight title there. Your opinion doesn't matter here.

He is clearly a middleweight as long he weighs and fight within the division. As for not being so far from retirement doesn't give him the rights to abuse his power to keep the belts.

[aboutfkntime]

Of course Cotto is serious about being a middleweight because he wanted to win his fourth weight title there. Your opinion doesn't matter here.

He is clearly a middleweight as long he weighs and fight within the division. As for not being so far from retirement doesn't give him the rights to abuse his power to keep the belts.

Who cares about the belts you silly ****.

Only casual fans need a roadmap to tell them who the best fighter is at any weight.

Cotto is making money, like a prizefighter should.

Stop crying because your current love-interest is unable to pad his underwhelming record with the legend that is Cotto

Silly **** !

[aboutfkntime]

I dont take Cotto seriously at middleweight, I dont see why I should......

So, it is fkn funny to see you guys sucking off Hypekin, and crying because Hypekin cannot pad his record with a fighter that I dont take seriously at the weight.

Fkn asshats !

[aboutfkntime]

Clowns......

If Hypekin is allowed to pad his underwhelming resume with the legend that is Cotto.... his resume will still be shht.

You all do know that, right ?

[Craveman]

Who cares about the belts you silly ****.

Only casual fans need a roadmap to tell them who the best fighter is at any weight.

Cotto is making money, like a prizefighter should.

Stop crying because your current love-interest is unable to pad his underwhelming record with the legend that is Cotto

Silly **** !

Looks like Cotto wants to hold on dearly for as long as possible. Why are you swearing at me? You mad? You know you are wrong and can't back it up.

[aboutfkntime]

Looks like Cotto wants to hold on dearly for as long as possible. Why are you swearing at me? You mad? You know you are wrong and can't back it up.

" hold on " ?

You mean, earn a living ?

Most likely, yep ^^

And BTW kid, the tears in your silly little cut-n-paste reply were delicious

[aboutfkntime]

Craveman.....

It is funny to see you sucking off Hypekin, and crying because Hypekin cannot pad his record with a fighter that I dont take seriously at the weight.

Cotto should fight Mayweather in September, Canelo next year, and then retire.

Who cares about whether his MW belt is on the line or not, because neither Mayweather or Canelo are middleweights.

He should not offer a payday to Hypekin.

Hypekin should make his own way, with legit achievements, like Cotto did.

[Craveman]

I dont take Cotto seriously at middleweight, I dont see why I should......

So, it is fkn funny to see you guys sucking off Hypekin, and crying because Hypekin cannot pad his record with a fighter that I dont take seriously at the weight.

Fkn asshats !

I find it really ****** that you don't take it serious care about Cotto fighting at middleweight with belts on the line. You know he can lose to Geale next week.

However, the fact remains that Cotto is ducking Golovkin.

Clowns......

If Hypekin is allowed to pad his underwhelming resume with the legend that is Cotto.... his resume will still be shht.

You all do know that, right ?

So you admit the "legendary" Cotto is just another **** name in a resume?