Tweet
Calzaghe is a middle aged man of 43 years. Joe has been retired for 7 years. Idiotic thread.
-
-
Bernard Hopkins the man Calzaghe robbed is still fighting at top level at 50 years old Slappy sniffed too many lines, drunk to much chased too many skanky ho's in retirement. put him out to grass in the Rhonnda ValleyOriginally posted by Canvas View Post
Comment
-
He should! King joe has nothing to lose and everything to gain. That would be huge in wembly! I'd watch it and all the way in so calComment
-
Only if he needed the money. Likewise for Froch.
The money would be huge, but Calzaghe is the only one who has something to gain, legacy wise. Froch beating Calzaghe, who is 43 and has not fought for 7 years would do pretty much nothing for Froch.Comment
-
Froch would wipe the floor with Joe at this stage
you dont party for years then come back and fight Carl effing Froch...that's just ******edComment
-
Joe's hands were GONE on his last few fights. If being retired for several years and 40-some years old wasn't enough reason not to come back. How about Tyson and Lewis, hell, why not sugar Ray? Bring em all back!Comment
-
You just bolstered the value of Calzaghe's win over Hopkins.Originally posted by CJRock View PostComment
-
did you see that fight? that "win" has no value since he couldn't even hit hopkins clean. let me guess clean punches don't matter? great boxing fan hereOriginally posted by Redd Foxx View PostComment
-
I voted no. I consider Calzaghe the better fighter but he is much older I think although I am not sure on that. Anyway he has be retired for a long time. Why should he risk his perfect record by coming back and fighting the still active Froch and give Froch such a huge advantage?Comment
-
So Joe came to the states and robbed Hopkins. Yeah, right.Comment
Comment