Originally posted by Reloaded
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd Mayweather on "Special Substance"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Heavyfist View PostYou only need a the****utic exemption for banned substances. So Floyd was taking banned substances.
And what's more, Floyd has negotiated the ability to retroactively get an exemption. That means if Floyd gets caught for using steroids, he just has to get a doctors note saying he has low testosterone and the USADA will throw the positive test out.
Floyd always stacks the decks, including with using PEDs. I mean, its kinda obvious when you think about Floyd as a person, obviously he'd be the first person to use PEDS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bald shavers View Postas all of us know, floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed by the boxing and general public for the boringness of the so-called "fight of the century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a smaller man (5 inch reach disadvantage, 2 inch height disadvantage) who medical verification has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt...
was fighting with only one arm.
now, mayweather is trying to re-write history by manipulating public perception via the deceptive act of bogusly blaming pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.
think. the problem is: The more mayweather blames pacquiao's shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and...
making meaningless his (floyd mayweather's) so-called "win."
besides accepting a rematch offer from pacquiao, how the hell can can floyd mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
Is mayweather's win really tarnished forever? Does it even count now that it will forever be remembered that he so-called "beat" a one armed man?
the mysterious the****utic use exemption that mayweather demanded from the authorities dramatically dilutes the so-called "win" against pacquiao to the point where the tarnishment may now be beyond repair.
116-112
116-112
Comment
-
Originally posted by IR0NFIST View PostI agree, that will never change, like Fraud Jr.'s history of domestic violence towards women.
Manny Pacquiao lost to Floyd Mayweather Jr. Like a child, he tried to deny it, and since made pathetic excuses for it. Like the Emporer's New Clothes, the whole Man of God persona has been shown as a fake. And now his pathetic cult followers are running around trying to salvage something frim the downfall. That's what happens when you get to emotionally tied to a fighter and live vicariously through them. It leaves you like..... well, you. LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by IR0NFIST View PostLikewise.
It's a shame that Fraud Jr.'s career will be overshadowed by his history of domestic violence towards women.
100 years from now, will the record books show that Floyd won the biggest fight in boxing history by winning "118-110; 116-112; 116-112"?
Or will the history books show that Floyd was 8-0 against women?
Or will it just show that Floyd was undefeated against man and woman
Who knows... Talk to me 100 years from now and let me know how it turns out...
In the meantime, suck on this for your troubles
Comment
-
Originally posted by low blows View PostThere is no way he would ever have low testosterone. Guys with that have boobs like a woman and a gut. Floyd has neither and is cut to the bone. Of course he isn't the only cheater in pro sports. The NFL has tons of players that have these notes. It's similar to using a calculator for a math test.....
He's almost 40 years old and his physique looks better now than it did when he was in his late 20's to early 30's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostOk... Whatever makes you happy... I guess we'll have to see what the record books show in the future.
100 years from now, will the record books show that Floyd won the biggest fight in boxing history by winning "118-110; 116-112; 116-112"?
Or will the history books show that Floyd was 8-0 against women?
Or will it just show that Floyd was undefeated against man and woman
Who knows... Talk to me 100 years from now and let me know how it turns out...
In the meantime, suck on this for your troubles
Last edited by IR0NFIST; 05-25-2015, 03:05 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bald Shavers View PostAs all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed by the boxing and general public for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a smaller man (5 inch reach disadvantage, 2 inch height disadvantage) who medical verification has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt...
was fighting with only one arm.
Now, Mayweather is trying to re-write history by manipulating public perception via the deceptive act of bogusly blaming Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.
THINK. The problem is: The more Mayweather blames Pacquiao's shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and...
making meaningless his (Floyd Mayweather's) so-called "win."
Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, how the hell can can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
Is Mayweather's win really tarnished forever? Does it even count now that it will forever be remembered that he so-called "beat" a one armed man?
The mysterious The****utic Use Exemption that Mayweather demanded from the authorities dramatically dilutes the so-called "win" against Pacquiao to the point where the tarnishment may now be beyond repair.
What is funny is that those so eager to tie that injury to the fight are tying the fact that Pacquiao was a man of excuses for losing for all time. He deserves better.... or at least used to.
Comment
-
Comment