Can someone define the phrase "Gave him a Boxing lesson?"

[Lester Tutor]

Boxing Lesson: A boxer who performed extraordinary well on said bout vs another boxer's performance, and is most cases showcases a "tactician" vs the other's poor strategy. Sluggers or brawlers are highly prone to an adversary that uses range, defense, and potshotting to control the bout while the other boxer misses frantically and not on his A game. Since most boxers, whether A level or C level boxers can usually be hit no martter what as it's part of the sport. Some fighters or boxer's leave a trademark offense in which highly IQ in the ring boxers can pick up on such as the Marquez and Pac series where such fighters learned a great deal from. It is said that Mayweather Jr. has the best reflexes on defense of our era has he's able to pounce or leap backwards counterring and counterring an attack while returning to the pocket. Even the most elite level offensive fighters take note of such defense they usually think twice on changing their strategy. The last great bout which included two highly IQ based fighters such Pac and Floyd proved one's classic performance as well as the others. The end result became conclusive in favoring the great defense of Mayweather. Just as one fighter can pull away from defense means the offensive fighter can move faster forward.

[Weltschmerz]

Gene Tunney vs Jack Dempsey.

[Boxfan83]

Boxing Lesson: A boxer who performed extraordinary well on said bout vs another boxer's performance, and is most cases showcases a "tactician" vs the other's poor strategy. Sluggers or brawlers are highly prone to an adversary that uses range, defense, and potshotting to control the bout while the other boxer misses frantically and not on his A game. Since most boxers, whether A level or C level boxers can usually be hit no martter what as it's part of the sport. Some fighters or boxer's leave a trademark offense in which highly IQ in the ring boxers can pick up on such as the Marquez and Pac series where such fighters learned a great deal from. It is said that Mayweather Jr. has the best reflexes on defense of our era has he's able to pounce or leap backwards counterring and counterring an attack while returning to the pocket. Even the most elite level offensive fighters take note of such defense they usually think twice on changing their strategy. The last great bout which included two highly IQ based fighters such Pac and Floyd proved one's classic performance as well as the others. The end result became conclusive in favoring the great defense of Mayweather. Just as one fighter can pull away from defense means the offensive fighter can move faster forward.

Dang SurgarKaine, this looks like something off Wikipedia. If this were yahoo answers, for sure youd get the best answer. lol! Good post thanks!

[Brickyardigan]

Making someone look amateurish, doesn't need to be a demolition. For example, Rigondeaux gave Donaire a boxing lesson.

Rigo demolished Donaire. Busted his eye up and everything. Had that guy running in the 12th.

[daggum]

Boxing Lesson: A boxer who performed extraordinary well on said bout vs another boxer's performance, and is most cases showcases a "tactician" vs the other's poor strategy. Sluggers or brawlers are highly prone to an adversary that uses range, defense, and potshotting to control the bout while the other boxer misses frantically and not on his A game. Since most boxers, whether A level or C level boxers can usually be hit no martter what as it's part of the sport. Some fighters or boxer's leave a trademark offense in which highly IQ in the ring boxers can pick up on such as the Marquez and Pac series where such fighters learned a great deal from. It is said that Mayweather Jr. has the best reflexes on defense of our era has he's able to pounce or leap backwards counterring and counterring an attack while returning to the pocket. Even the most elite level offensive fighters take note of such defense they usually think twice on changing their strategy. The last great bout which included two highly IQ based fighters such Pac and Floyd proved one's classic performance as well as the others. The end result became conclusive in favoring the great defense of Mayweather. Just as one fighter can pull away from defense means the offensive fighter can move faster forward.

pac landed the cleaner harder punches so how did floyd have great defense? I think you fell for the classic quantity over quality tactic. also clinching and bending below the waist aren't great defense since they are illegal. its like saying low blows are great offense.

[Brickyardigan]

The men on the left side are the ones who gave the lesson to the right sided opponents:

Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Pacquiao, Canelo, Guerrero, Maidana, Gatti, etc.

Vasyl Lomachenko vs Gary Russell

Bernard Hopkins vs Shumenov

Rigondeaux vs everyone

Juan Francisco Estrada vs Gonzalez

Marquez vs Pacquaio 1,2,3

[SlySlickSmooth]

117-111 or better decision with no close rounds and the rounds won should be heavily dominated.

Making your opponent be 2-3 steps behind, making him miss and making him pay, and not allowing him to set up traps on you.

[Don Pichardo]

Seems like this phrase is thrown around loosely mostly when one fighter failed to entertain. When I first think of the phrase, I think of a boxer basically pitching a 12rd UD shutout but I hear this phrase used when a boxer wins a lackluster 7-5, 8-4, 9-3 UD. Also if one boxer KO/TKO's their opponent at anytime of the match, even if they're down on the cards, wouldnt that be considered, "Giving them a Boxing lesson" as well? KO's/TKO's are a HUGE part of the sport so Id think so. But what are your thoughts?

the best example I can give for a boxing lesson is Mayweather vs canelo

the best example for not giving a boxing lesson was Trinidad vs Dela Hoeya. YOu cant run the last four rounds and not throw any punches and then cry that you gave a boxing lesson after you deserved loss. smdh to Oscar

[Ryn0]

You cant use the saying if the fight was competitive, Hopkins - Tito is my benchmark.

[Puya]

Seems like this phrase is thrown around loosely mostly when one fighter failed to entertain. When I first think of the phrase, I think of a boxer basically pitching a 12rd UD shutout but I hear this phrase used when a boxer wins a lackluster 7-5, 8-4, 9-3 UD. Also if one boxer KO/TKO's their opponent at anytime of the match, even if they're down on the cards, wouldnt that be considered, "Giving them a Boxing lesson" as well? KO's/TKO's are a HUGE part of the sport so Id think so. But what are your thoughts?

Basically with the bold statement. is the successful application of the Sweat Science.

Similar to what Ringodeux was doing to Donaire in most of the fight. What Floyd did in rounds 9, 10 and 11 vs Pac

Etc. Basically is total domination by Boxing the others guy's ears off.

Somethig different than that is a Fan thing blidness