Comments Thread For: Trout: Maidana Did Better Than Pacquiao With Floyd

[Doctor_Tenma]

Trout saying Pacquiao gave up in the middle rounds is off-base, he won rounds 9 & 10 (confirmed by the Vegas judges).

All these guys backing Floyd like automated zombies when Floyd's out there betting on them to get KO'd then posting it publicly with no thought for them at all. They're being sycophants for someone who wouldn't pi$$ on them if they were on fire.

Round 9 he looked pathetic, that was neither close or competitive. That was one of Mayweather's better rounds. Round 10 he didn't win either, his efforts were equally as pathetic with Mayweather both outlanding him/ landing the better punches throughout.

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

i thought pacquiao vs mayweather was very close..much more so than any floyd fight except castillo 1 ,oscar delanhoya, and cotto.
I don't know what trout saw but then again he got whooped by canelo who floyd washed.

i was at that fight trout did not get whooped by canelo

[Robbie Barrett]

It's gone from "If Maidana can hit Mayweather with so many punches imagine what Pac will do" to "Styles make fights". Finally these Pac stans are learning.

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

it's gone from "if maidana can hit mayweather with so many punches imagine what pac will do" to "styles make fights". Finally these pac stans are learning.

punches in bunches, angles, the need for speep, foot work off the heezey!!!!!!!

[Champ Is Here]

Maidana is taller and bigger than Manny. Manny, Marquez, too small for Floyd. Its funny, cause brian kenny said floyd was picking on marquez cause of his size. May said to him, pacquiao is small so what are you saying. And...

[MrRolltide91]

he's right.....

[wlliam]

As the big Floyd fan, that's what you want to emphasize. Not that Mayweather also had a career low output all across the board. He was content with just doing enough to secure his usual points decision victory. His Dad wanted him to press the action, the crowd wanted him to press the action. Yet somehow it's all Pacquiao's fault right? The fault lies on both boxers. They both robbed us of a good fight. Not just Pacquiao. Floyd fans need to own up to this. Yes, you guys got the W but at least admit Floyd could have also done more for the fans.

How i see it, Floyd did exactly what he needed to win and im basing that off Pacs successful rds. Pac was touching Floyd nicely at mid-range and if the fight stayed there the fight wouldve been alot closer. Floyd found success at full range, Pac couldnt overcome that.

[HarvardBlue]

^ Looks like I hit a chord.

No you didn't. Just making sure a loser like you gets checked. I know its comforting to hide behind a keyboard and make outrageous statements but I doubt you would outside your mother's basement.

[Calabis]

Its funny everyone that actual boxers or professionals looks at that match as a masterpiece/domination by Floyd...unfortunately they can see more than just punches, ie: footwork, resetting Pac, turning him, check hook to get off ropes and out of corners...then u come here and u have a bunch of tards trying to give Pac the fight

[UNBIASED BOXING]

8-4 Floyd, nothing left to say. Pacquiao 5 years ago would have won.















Just kidding! Pacquiao 5 years ago would have been a better fight for sure, but Floyd would have still held it down. That height and reach advantage is too much for him to overcome (when combined with Floyd's superb skill and speed).

Still, I blame Marquez for KTFO of Pacman and making him fight less aggressively.