Mayweather's No Win Legacy Dilemma - Catch 22

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bluebeam
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 3839
    • 121
    • 0
    • 31,012

    #21
    Originally posted by gamesworn
    I guess you are not boxing fan just a nuthugger. People *****ing about Pacquiao Performance against May and forget what actually Floyd did to Pacquio to warrant his win (almost nothing).

    I suggest you rewatch the whole fight in slowmo. You can see how badly Mayweather missing his punches and how well Pacquiao blocked Mayweathers punch.


    boxing matches are not fought in slow motion, so why the hell would I watch it in slow motion.

    I have heard it all now.


    we have too watch fights in slow motion now to determine a winner.

    Comment

    • DeadLikeMe
      ................
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2011
      • 11968
      • 748
      • 1,409
      • 26,662

      #22
      This some North Korea type ****. Really makes me feel bad for them tbh.

      Comment

      • gamesworn
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2014
        • 736
        • 111
        • 144
        • 13,081

        #23
        Originally posted by bluebeam
        I have yet too see one scorecard from hbo showtime, the 3 official judges or any media member that had pacquiao winning the fight.

        when your own network doesn't defend you, that says something.

        jim lampley is the biggest pacquiao groupie in the world and even he said pacquiao lost
        Then I guess you need to rewatch the fight in slow mo and score it for yourself and turn off the volume to avoid the biased commentating. Don't be a sheep. Both fighters were actually fast that some of their clean punches we didn't saw live.

        Comment

        • Mr. Philadel
          #215Boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 20893
          • 1,071
          • 1,413
          • 35,332

          #24
          Originally posted by gamesworn
          I thought Bob Arum is a Liar. Now you believe him when it fits to your agenda. SMH
          agenda?!?...you're the one in here defending ****ery...not me!!

          Comment

          • gamesworn
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Dec 2014
            • 736
            • 111
            • 144
            • 13,081

            #25
            Originally posted by bluebeam
            boxing matches are not fought in slow motion, so why the hell would I watch it in slow motion.

            I have heard it all now.


            we have too watch fights in slow motion now to determine a winner.
            I guess you are not boxing fan, just a nuthuggeer too. Like I said, both fighters were extremely fast that Slow Motion is needed to actually see what is really happening in the fight. Hell why do HBO and Showtime highlights the best punches of the round in slow mo. To show us if the fighter connects or not and to have a clear view of that particular round (who wins the round).

            Comment

            • gamesworn
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2014
              • 736
              • 111
              • 144
              • 13,081

              #26
              Originally posted by Mr. Philadel
              agenda?!?...you're the one in here defending ****ery...not me!!
              LOL. What ****ery I'm defending. I'm very vocal about Arum being a liar. Look at my old post. I know Bob is a liar and you won't see me here defending him for being a liar because he is.

              Comment

              • RED REP
                LEFT HOOK FROM HELL
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 1397
                • 72
                • 2
                • 7,879

                #27
                Originally posted by Bald Shavers
                As all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a man who medical verification proved was fighting with only one arm.

                Now, he wants to blame Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.

                The problem is: The more Mayweather blames shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and making meaningless his so-called "win."

                Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, he can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
                Awwww. Another thread.

                Comment

                • V.WEBB
                  CBVM
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 14329
                  • 621
                  • 174
                  • 21,453

                  #28
                  Originally posted by pbp
                  my gawd. You guys really had your hearts in this fight.
                  *lives.....

                  Comment

                  • eric kelly
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 59
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    • 6,972

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Bald Shavers
                    As all of us know, Floyd -
                    I like how this idiot starts his post off with "As all of us know..."

                    So you're thinking for other people now? You set your comment up to try and rally up as much people as possible to agree with >YOUR< statement. As if those of us who don't agree with you will stray away from the post because you just rallied up your soldiers by says "as all of us know...". Well, perhaps you meant as all of us IDIOTS know.

                    Fighters have been fighting injured for decades, win lose or draw and you don't hear them using their injury as an excuse to why they lost or why they won, etc.

                    Bottom line is that Floyd beat Pacquiao, simple as that. Floyd's been fighting most of his fights with ****ed up hands, you don't hear him making excuses as to why some fights were close or went the distance. Ward, etc all have fought with injuries and some parts broken.

                    Be a man and stop being a so full of hate and disdain.

                    Comment

                    • punchr
                      get-up-and-go
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 4188
                      • 254
                      • 621
                      • 61,418

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Toyman
                      exactly how i saw it as well.

                      floyd never hurt manny, whereas manny rocked him at least 2-3 times.

                      what i found impressive was how many was actually the one going forward, and evading/blocking most of floyd's shots. what floyd did manage to land, was mostly soft jabs.

                      bear in mind, its even more impressive when you realize manny only had 1 arm. floyd just had no answer for the straight left unfortunately.
                      Mayweather hurt him with a low blow

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP