Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's No Win Legacy Dilemma - Catch 22

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mayweather's No Win Legacy Dilemma - Catch 22

    As all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a man who medical verification proved was fighting with only one arm.

    Now, he wants to blame Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.

    The problem is: The more Mayweather blames shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and making meaningless his so-called "win."

    Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, he can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?

  • #2
    thats sum salty balut right there

    Comment


    • #3
      Meanwhile, somewhere in boxing.

      Comment


      • #4

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bald Shavers View Post
          As all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a man who medical verification proved was fighting with only one arm.

          Now, he wants to blame Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.

          The problem is: The more Mayweather blames shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and making meaningless his so-called "win."

          Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, he can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
          Only *****s thinks it's a great win.I rewatched and scored it again and I have Pacquiao ahead of 1 point (I have 10-10 rounds). There so many slow motion fight of May-Pac in youtube and if you rewatch it most of Floyd's best punch were actually blocked by Pacquiao and the high percentage of his jab were actually evaded. And there are so many clean punch by Pacquiao that the commentary didn't even mention. All the commentary saw was the majority of Floyd's jab that really didn't even connect and his ring generalship. I suggest you watch it again and turn off the biased commentating that night.

          This is the playlist of May-Pac in Slow Motion
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTG7...AN5yx8aO3xinjo


          .

          Comment


          • #6
            jeez it was just a boxing match. This is some serious denial.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by gamesworn View Post
              Only *****s thinks it's a great win.I rewatched and scored it again and I have Pacquiao ahead of 1 point (I have 10-10 rounds). There so many slow motion fight of May-Pac in youtube and if you rewatch it most of Floyd's best punch were actually blocked by Pacquiao and the high percentage of his jab were actually evaded. And there are so many clean punch by Pacquiao that the commentary didn't even mention. All the commentary saw was the majority of Floyd's jab that really didn't even connect and his ring generalship. I suggest you watch it again and turn off the biased commentating that night.

              This is the playlist of May-Pac in Slow Motion
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTG7...AN5yx8aO3xinjo


              .
              wow just wow. So I'm guessing this is it huh? this is the official story you guys all decided on ... it's just too much

              Comment


              • #8
                Meanwhile Canelo is the biggest talk in boxing!

                Comment


                • #9
                  The truth is most people saw Pacquiao winning that fight. Some may say Floyd won but thats only cuz they don't want the NSAC screwing them over in future fights. Lomochenko said Pacquiao won but hes so good that hes not worried about pissing off the wrong people

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm sorry, but I'm not going to accept Mayweather winning this fight.

                    A. He barely landed more punches than Pacquiao
                    B. Pacquiao landed the hardest blows during this fight
                    C. Repeat A and B



                    He also promised an "Action packed fight" He's the A- side. He gets the blame. Him. Period.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP