Comments Thread For: Hearn Not in Favor of Froch vs. Golovkin Clash

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Hearn Not in Favor of Froch vs. Golovkin Clash

    Promoter Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Sport is not in favor of Carl Froch facing WBA/IBO middleweight champion Gennady "GGG" Golovkin, because he feels the Nottingham fighter will not be motivated to face the dangerous puncher.

    Froch has not fought since last May's knockout victory against George Groves at Wembley Stadium. He was very motivated to face Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. in a Las Vegas pay-per-view encounter. That didn't happen after Chavez was knocked out last month and Froch was recently stripped of his WBA super middleweight title.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Ham Porter
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 2552
    • 242
    • 51
    • 9,574

    #2
    In other news:

    Comment

    • Tay Roc
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2013
      • 6375
      • 364
      • 528
      • 8,069

      #3
      But how many people attended Froch's last fight at Wembley Staduim?

      Comment

      • Doggy Tang
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Apr 2015
        • 87
        • 6
        • 3
        • 6,160

        #4
        How can he get motivated for GGG when GGG has never headlined at Wembley!? I mean do we need to have Carl remind you all?

        Comment

        • Humean
          Infidel
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 3054
          • 126
          • 110
          • 10,285

          #5
          This is a shocking revelation, in no way predictable whatsoever.

          Comment

          • MDPopescu
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2012
            • 24153
            • 1,504
            • 2,009
            • 4,138,611

            #6
            ... And precisely why did Eddie Hearn provide this statement?

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #7
              I find it funny that WBA stripped Froch who defended it against a mandatory in May 2014, but not Ward who hasn't defended against a mandatory ever and when Froch last fought, he hadn't fought in 7 months then and still hasn't fought!

              Comment

              • i'm a fun haver
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2012
                • 2651
                • 87
                • 143
                • 9,236

                #8
                If you can't get motivated to fight somebody who is trying to put their fist through the back of your skull, then you need to go find something else to do

                Comment

                • Eastcoast
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2014
                  • 8639
                  • 288
                  • 0
                  • 15,501

                  #9
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  I find it funny that WBA stripped Froch who defended it against a mandatory in May 2014, but not Ward who hasn't defended against a mandatory ever and when Froch last fought, he hadn't fought in 7 months then and still hasn't fought!
                  Mendoza is a money grubber. Froch's calling it quits and Ward's about to get busy again with some decent money behind him - easy choice for him to make.

                  Comment

                  • New England
                    Strong champion.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 37514
                    • 1,926
                    • 1,486
                    • 97,173

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LacedUp
                    I find it funny that WBA stripped Froch who defended it against a mandatory in May 2014, but not Ward who hasn't defended against a mandatory ever and when Froch last fought, he hadn't fought in 7 months then and still hasn't fought!



                    ward beat froch, and is an infinitely better fighter. surely that has no bearing, and we should only be concerned with our carl getting a chance to require rematches against awful fighters who almost knock him out.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP