NSAC Score Sheet of The Fight of the Century is FISHY

[Chuckguy]

if he would just read my last post which has clear evidence he would know that his far reaching conspiracy is bs but then again thats not what he wants to hear

I actually just read all the posts and he is avoiding the legit ones. What I don't get is why do u fools fall for these troll threads.?
I'm a fan of both and to me Floyd clearly won the fight. I had it 116-112. It was closer than Floyd fans think but it was a clear win for Floyd
My good friend who hates Floyd with a passion text me in round 9
"PAC is getting schooled"
I hope they do rematch in Macau and with a healthy PAC and the more PAC opens up the more opportunities

[Rath]

ya except your forgetting the actual guys doing the scoring had it right they had mayweather in blue corner manny in the red the only one who didnt was the guy who tabulated the scores at the end which is not the actual scorecard. this is what an actual scorecard looks like by round this is the official scorecards from round 9 they dont keep the whole paper in front the judges as it can lead to corruption so yes now that i know why you were asking these questions (trying to discredit floyd) is because of this ridiculous conspiracy but the reality is the actual judges had it right and they read off the correct winner at the end the only thing that was wrong it the letter r and b on the tabulators scorecard at the end which has no baring on the actual scoring keep in mind. but hey i give u an A for effort

Check the score sheet you posted.

it clearly says Floyd was on Blue and Pac was on red.

Which means whether judges are scoring it by name or whether they are scoring it by color they are right.

But why would the tabulator write Mayweather unanimous winner? when it clearly said Red corner wins and that was supported by your evidence that judges knows indeed Floyd was on the Blue corner and Pac was on the Red Corner?

There is only one round in this post round 9.

could you post all the rounds

Floyd fans says they owned me Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

[Mike D]

I actually just read all the posts and he is avoiding the legit ones. What I don't get is why do u fools fall for these troll threads.?
I'm a fan of both and to me Floyd clearly won the fight. I had it 116-112. It was closer than Floyd fans think but it was a clear win for Floyd
My good friend who hates Floyd with a passion text me in round 9
"PAC is getting schooled"

Yeah same here. I had it 9-3, with maybe an additional swing round that could've made it 8-4. I watched the fight with an entire room of people rooting either for Manny (or against Floyd, take your pick), and we all had it in that scoring range.

[Sweet Pea 50]

I actually just read all the posts and he is avoiding the legit ones. What I don't get is why do u fools fall for these troll threads.?
I'm a fan of both and to me Floyd clearly won the fight. I had it 116-112. It was closer than Floyd fans think but it was a clear win for Floyd
My good friend who hates Floyd with a passion text me in round 9
"PAC is getting schooled"
I hope they do rematch in Macau and with a healthy PAC and the more PAC opens up the more opportunities

[Rath]

Again the name in the final tabulated sheet does not correspond corner assignment.

the name Floyd vs Pac was there to inform who are the fighters that are fighting in that sheet, not necessarily below them are their assigned corner.

The tabulator are tallying the score per round and by cinci champs post.

the judges knows which was the assigned corner for each fighter.

Round 9 was your evidence, the tabulator correctly put it in their corresponding corner

where was the mistake?

[MrP4P]

Again the name in the final tabulated sheet does not correspond corner assignment.

the name Floyd vs Pac was there to inform who are the fighters that are fighting in that sheet, not necessarily below them are their assigned corner.

The tabulator are tallying the score per round and by cinci champs post.

the judges knows which was the assigned corner for each fighter.

Round 9 was your evidence, the tabulator correctly put it in their corresponding corner

where was the mistake?

What is it that you really want to hear?

That scorecards were wrong and the judges meant to score it for Pacquiao?

[Rath]

hey brush, hey cinci, hey Floyd fans why are you all suddenly became quiet.

where was the mistake.

cinci champ evidence were correct. the name and the corner assignment.

meaning they were judging the fight correctly whether they judged it by name or by corner assignment.

the tabulator was also correct base on the evidence that you gave.

so where was the mistake?

[Rath]

What is it that you really want to hear?

That scorecards were wrong and the judges meant to score it for Pacquiao?

where are the judges wrong?

cinci champ gave evidence of the actual score sheet for individual round.

they were correct.

the tabulator was also correct.

where is the mistake?

[In Motion]

Rath, after you log off tonight (assuming you will LOG OFF at some point), please don't hurt yourself. You are an essential part of this forum, and it's been sincerely fun making fun of you and #48. You bring us great pleasure. Thank you.

[Rath]

Rath, after you log off tonight (assuming you will LOG OFF at some point), please don't hurt yourself. You are an essential part of this forum, and it's been sincerely fun making fun of you and #48. You bring us great pleasure. Thank you.

hahahaha let see who will have the last laugh.

oh by the way can you tell me where was the mistake made by the judges?