I've read a few times and I honestly don't think there is anything logical to follow the word 'didn't' there. Not sure what you were trying to say but I promise it didn't make sense.
So wait, he fights through the injury and that means it's fake? Comon now, we heard reports of Pac being injured and using anti-inflammatories weeks before the fight. We have a credible doctor supposedly risking his reputation by claiming to have verified the injury. We have the NSAC threatening sanctions and potential charges for not disclosing the injury before. But what do we have from your side that is that concrete? All I hear is anti-pac speculation of doctors being paid off in addition to the claim of NSAC I guess just doing what it's doing for no reason?
Edit: In other words NSAC believes injury is real, all discussions I can see amongst analysts and other media believe the injury is real, and just a few hardcore flo-mos that think otherwise. It seems about as deluded as the hardcore pac fans who thought Pac won the fight.
So wait, he fights through the injury and that means it's fake? Comon now, we heard reports of Pac being injured and using anti-inflammatories weeks before the fight. We have a credible doctor supposedly risking his reputation by claiming to have verified the injury. We have the NSAC threatening sanctions and potential charges for not disclosing the injury before. But what do we have from your side that is that concrete? All I hear is anti-pac speculation of doctors being paid off in addition to the claim of NSAC I guess just doing what it's doing for no reason?
Edit: In other words NSAC believes injury is real, all discussions I can see amongst analysts and other media believe the injury is real, and just a few hardcore flo-mos that think otherwise. It seems about as deluded as the hardcore pac fans who thought Pac won the fight.

Comment