Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Exposing the inaccuracy of Compubox

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    I also thought the compubox numbers were off. Good analysis daggum.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by LesMoonves BOSS View Post
      I also thought the compubox numbers were off. Good analysis daggum.
      Oh wow you're still here?

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Obayifo View Post
        Oh wow you're still here?
        Oh wow YOU'RE still here? Lol. I thought you were whining to get this thread deleted 4 pages ago. Haha. Stuck around huh

        Comment


        • #54
          my total fight numbers were

          total punches

          floyd 109
          pac 100

          jabs

          floyd 54
          pac 22

          power punches

          floyd 45
          pac 42

          body shots

          floyd 8
          pac 36

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            my total fight numbers were

            total punches

            floyd 109
            pac 100

            jabs

            floyd 54
            pac 22

            power punches

            floyd 45
            pac 42

            body shots

            floyd 8
            pac 36
            So we're comparing the punches one guy thinks landed vs the number another guy thinks landed? How is this scientific again?

            If you really want to "prove" something, make a video clearly highlighting each shot you thought landed. That way, there's no room for subjectivity.

            Comment


            • #56
              my summary of the fight from analyzing it in depth. pac clearly won 6 rounds: 3,4,6,7,8, and 10. floyd clearly won 5 rounds: 1,2,5,11,12. The 9th round really was a toss up if i had to lean i would probably give it to pac for simply landing the harder punches. An even round is also fine and giving it to floyd isn't wrong at all. So my card would be either 7-5 pac, 6-5-1 even pac or a draw 6-6.

              my reasoning: round 3 a lot of people seem to give to floyd but I can't see why. pac outlanded him in total punches, power punches, and had the best punch of the round. round 6 floyd actually outlanded pac 15-14 but most of floyd's punches were jabs while all of pacs were power to the head and body and he also had floyd wobbled. A clear example of a round where quality over quantity trumps. Round 8 was also an example of quality over quantity as floyd outlanded pac 11-9 but pac stunned him with 3 great flush punches. floyd's power punches lacked any authority or flushness in this round and pac landed the 3 best punches of the round that slightly troubled floyd so I think he deserves this round.

              Comment


              • #57
                Compubox is trash.

                Anyone arguing this fight based on Compubox numbers alone should gouge their eyes out.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by daggum View Post
                  my summary of the fight from analyzing it in depth. pac clearly won 6 rounds: 3,4,6,7,8, and 10. floyd clearly won 5 rounds: 1,2,5,11,12. The 9th round really was a toss up if i had to lean i would probably give it to pac for simply landing the harder punches. An even round is also fine and giving it to floyd isn't wrong at all. So my card would be either 7-5 pac, 6-5-1 even pac or a draw 6-6.

                  my reasoning: round 3 a lot of people seem to give to floyd but I can't see why. pac outlanded him in total punches, power punches, and had the best punch of the round. round 6 floyd actually outlanded pac 15-14 but most of floyd's punches were jabs while all of pacs were power to the head and body and he also had floyd wobbled. A clear example of a round where quality over quantity trumps. Round 8 was also an example of quality over quantity as floyd outlanded pac 11-9 but pac stunned him with 3 great flush punches. floyd's power punches lacked any authority or flushness in this round and pac landed the 3 best punches of the round that slightly troubled floyd so I think he deserves this round.
                  Exactly those judges scorecards were bogus.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                    So we're comparing the punches one guy thinks landed vs the number another guy thinks landed? How is this scientific again?

                    If you really want to "prove" something, make a video clearly highlighting each shot you thought landed. That way, there's no room for subjectivity.
                    I have slow-motion. I have replay. They don't.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by daggum View Post
                      my summary of the fight from analyzing it in depth. pac clearly won 6 rounds: 3,4,6,7,8, and 10. floyd clearly won 5 rounds: 1,2,5,11,12. The 9th round really was a toss up if i had to lean i would probably give it to pac for simply landing the harder punches. An even round is also fine and giving it to floyd isn't wrong at all. So my card would be either 7-5 pac, 6-5-1 even pac or a draw 6-6.

                      my reasoning: round 3 a lot of people seem to give to floyd but I can't see why. pac outlanded him in total punches, power punches, and had the best punch of the round. round 6 floyd actually outlanded pac 15-14 but most of floyd's punches were jabs while all of pacs were power to the head and body and he also had floyd wobbled. A clear example of a round where quality over quantity trumps. Round 8 was also an example of quality over quantity as floyd outlanded pac 11-9 but pac stunned him with 3 great flush punches. floyd's power punches lacked any authority or flushness in this round and pac landed the 3 best punches of the round that slightly troubled floyd so I think he deserves this round.
                      You're so pathetic.

                      48-0

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP