Tweet
The best boxer in history
Not the best resume, or most titles or accolades... Not greatest but best
He beat champions and hall of famers from 92-03 with just a DQ loss and hardly ever lost rounds before he was 35 years old
Fighters are judged by their best years not 35 years old and up
Put it this way...I wouldn't favor anyone over him from 154-168 prime for prime
High ring IQ with power, defense, best reflexes and arguably the best counterpuncher ever.... I'd favor him over hagler, monzon, srr, etc
He was a once in a lifetime talent
Not the best resume, or most titles or accolades... Not greatest but best
He beat champions and hall of famers from 92-03 with just a DQ loss and hardly ever lost rounds before he was 35 years old
Fighters are judged by their best years not 35 years old and up
Put it this way...I wouldn't favor anyone over him from 154-168 prime for prime
High ring IQ with power, defense, best reflexes and arguably the best counterpuncher ever.... I'd favor him over hagler, monzon, srr, etc
He was a once in a lifetime talent
Comment