We should be talking about Mayweather v Pacquiao III, instead we watched a contest between two fighters past their best and Mayweather won against Pacquiao whos skillset has declined at his age. Mayweather on the other hand, has a skillset which doesn't decline at the same rate and for that, he has to be praised for being smart enough to fight the way he does.
All great sportsmen need rivals and Mayweather and Pacquiao should have fought at least twice, possibly 3 (depending on the outcomes) and only then would we know who was the best fighter of their era, as in any other sport, the best face the best (in their prime).
This is why UFC has become popular as the fights the fans want, happen, they find a way to make it happen when fighters are at the top of their game.
Still, I won't feel sorry for Pacquiao as he has made a fortune, yet I hope boxing learns from this and in the future we never see a repeat of such a delayed fight taking place.
All great sportsmen need rivals and Mayweather and Pacquiao should have fought at least twice, possibly 3 (depending on the outcomes) and only then would we know who was the best fighter of their era, as in any other sport, the best face the best (in their prime).
This is why UFC has become popular as the fights the fans want, happen, they find a way to make it happen when fighters are at the top of their game.
Still, I won't feel sorry for Pacquiao as he has made a fortune, yet I hope boxing learns from this and in the future we never see a repeat of such a delayed fight taking place.
Comment