Comments Thread For: Mayweather Outpoints Pacquiao Over 12 Rounds

[venom715]

Its all over and this one can be laid to rest. Floyd was Floyd but Manny could not be Manny tonight. Clearly Floyd takes the P4P crown. Cong**** to the Money team!

[chike99]

Always better to win ugly than to lose pretty.

[Sosay]

How can you school somebody if you're running all night, stop the BS. JR weighs 165 lbs or more and runs all night. TBE my A S S.
Floyd jr didn't do s h i t, ask his father!

Now analyze Pac! If this ^^^^^ is how you feel about Floyd 2NIGHT, you must think Pac is a bum! Bcuz this wasn't close at all!

[Marvellous1]

It's so predictable that all those wishing the fight had happened 5 years ago, stop short of acknowledging WHY it didn't. If Pacquiao had agreed to the conditions then as he did now, we'd have had this fight. As I keep saying, only two things changed in 5 years:

1) Pacquiao accepted 10% less

2) Pacquiao agreed to more stringent testing with no cut-off dates.

It may hurt to accept it but it is true that only one side changed their stance and THAT is why it never happened 5 years ago.

Even though Manny Pacquiao is a legend of the sport, I have to call him on his poor attitude to the loss. First insisting he won (I thought only Marquez did that, right?) and then crying injury afterwards. So much for the humble man of God. The roles were truly reversed in this fight.

[!! Shawn]

Why are people making excuses for Pac? I wanted him to win as much as the other guy but this is what happens when he fights someone faster than him. Many of us said it... Floyd has the quicker single ****s and most of all the faster mind and reaction time. Pac said it himself...if only he'd have stayed still.

Pacquiao would have done more 5 years ago? Based off what? Beating on come forward fighters?

I love the comments that Floyd waited til pac got older but the irony is how everyone was talking about how Floyd has slowed down including Roach.


And Floyd is older... So that makes zero sense.

Floyd out threw, out landed and landed at a higher percentage. It was sad to see Pac look like a one dimentional fighter with zero adaptability. He looked like an amateur at times... Now I need to find someone else to KO floyd. :/

Cotto was not a come forward fighter. Cotto was skilled versatile and multi dimensional. He could pressure you, box off the back foot, work around you, give you angles, play 4 corner defense, and had a very versatile offense, which is why even an aged past his best Cotto gave Floyd a very hard night.

Pacquiao developed versatility. He was the kind of fighter that would fight for free because he loved a good scrap. Then he started to soften, and slow, and deteriorate as a fighter.

[Marvellous1]

NO...my post still stands...he's a prize fighter for his mouth.for being controversial..NOT for a real prize fighter....why do you think casual fans always come away disappointed in Mayweather fights? cause he schooled all his opponents? please...people want action...but give him credit he played the fans constantly.....he's the biggest con artist of them all...but he's a great boxer nonetheless.

Nah. The bigger con artist was Bob Arum, marketing Pacquiao to be the bogey man for Mayweather. He was built up as the one Mayweather scared of, the hero, the man of the people, the humble champion and the one with the all-conquering style to beat the man they all love to hate with the style fans love to watch.

All of it was debunked last night (during the fight and after it) and may well have been 5 years ago if Pacquiao had agreed then to what he agreed now. Bob fooled a lot people. Hate on him.

[radioraheem]

28 pages.....EVol where are you?

Golovkin too

[solo20]

It's so predictable that all those wishing the fight had happened 5 years ago, stop short of acknowledging WHY it didn't. If Pacquiao had agreed to the conditions then as he did now, we'd have had this fight. As I keep saying, only two things changed in 5 years:

1) Pacquiao accepted 10% less

2) Pacquiao agreed to more stringent testing with no cut-off dates.

It may hurt to accept it but it is true that only one side changed their stance and THAT is why it never happened 5 years ago.

Even though Manny Pacquiao is a legend of the sport, I have to call him on his poor attitude to the loss. First insisting he won (I thought only Marquez did that, right?) and then crying injury afterwards. So much for the humble man of God. The roles were truly reversed in this fight.

cant compare JMM fights a lot of his were very close even when he lost to Mayweather he didn't say he won NOT ONE TIME

[BoxingJunkie]

So much for that killer instinct...

[Sosay]

Mayweather won, as much as I hate to admit it... but anyone who thought it was easy is crazy. He didn't "school" Manny at all. He only did enough to win on points and Manny did catch him with some good shots. He just seem like he let Floyd off the hook too many times. He didn't throw his left that often either. And of course, Floyd's clinching didn't help.

Well...it's time to fight Keith Thurman next.

Bro, he hit him clean like 4 times! I don't know if it was easy, per se! But it wasn't close at all. Being generous only gets you 8 to 4! And for the best to fighters of a generation, Pac did no better than ROBERT GUERRERO! Show respect and speak truth, Floyd is much better. He just respected Pacs power, and BOXED!