Max Kellerman is a total tool and Wlad handled him brilliantly

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ////
    ////
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2014
    • 14948
    • 952
    • 671
    • 111,577

    #31
    Originally posted by daggum


    he's not a clincher! it was just that one fight! this is just good old fashioned leaning.
    yes followed by the KO of the year

    Comment

    • beez721
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 9637
      • 252
      • 55
      • 16,400

      #32
      Originally posted by Cruisin'
      yes followed by the KO of the year

      that left hook was brutal

      Comment

      • BennyST
        Shhhh...
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 9263
        • 1,036
        • 500
        • 21,301

        #33
        Originally posted by beez721
        besides the povetkin fiasco his clinching has not been to the point of dq worthy
        Maybe, maybe not. But it has certainly, and very consistently, been to the point that he should be warned, and have points deducted, which would then stop the damn clinching. It's absurdly excessive.

        It ruins fights and is illegal for a good reason. It stops opponents being able to fight properly and fight their fight fairly.

        Comment

        • BennyST
          Shhhh...
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 9263
          • 1,036
          • 500
          • 21,301

          #34
          Originally posted by Cruisin'
          wlads ko ratio being maong the highest in heavyweight history kind of offsets his clinching

          the povetkin fight was atrocious but its dishonest to act like that was representative of the rest of his career
          It doesn't offset anything. First off, it's the biggest cause for his KOs. It illegally tires his opponents out and makes them spend half the fight wrestling instead of punching. Second, it's illegal. It's against the rules. It's stops the opponent from being able to fairly implement his own fight plan.

          If someone came in and just landed low blows until the opponent was spending half his time trying to block low blows until they got KOd, would you call that fair and say "well, he got the KO, so it offsets the fouls that allowed the KO to happen"?

          Low blows, head butts and clinching are against the rules because they unfairly advantage the fighter that uses them and creates an uneven fight with one guy at a disadvantage.

          Comment

          • cupocity303
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2005
            • 9604
            • 752
            • 750
            • 22,038

            #35
            Originally posted by BennyST
            Maybe, maybe not. But it has certainly, and very consistently, been to the point that he should be warned, and have points deducted, which would then stop the damn clinching. It's absurdly excessive.

            It ruins fights and is illegal for a good reason. It stops opponents being able to fight properly and fight their fight fairly.
            The only thing that is excessive is the people bringing up his clinching. This wasn't a point of conversation a few years ago.

            The talking points a few years ago were that he was too cautious and let fights go on for far longer then he should have. The criticism was that he should've KO'd his opponents in the first 2 rounds a la Mike Tyson style instead of dragging it out.

            And yes the Povetkin fight exacerbated the holding/clinching narrative.

            Comment

            • Fury4daWIN
              takin' one for the team
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2015
              • 3110
              • 156
              • 318
              • 2,222

              #36
              Originally posted by Cupo303
              The only thing that is excessive is the people bringing up his clinching. This wasn't a point of conversation a few years ago.

              The talking points a few years ago were that he was too cautious and let fights go on for far longer then he should have. The criticism was that he should've KO'd his opponents in the first 2 rounds a la Mike Tyson style instead of dragging it out.

              And yes the Povetkin fight exacerbated the holding/clinching narrative.
              His clinching has been apparent since the first Peter fight. The Povetkin fight simply made it apparent to everyone just what a huge part of his game it's been for years and to what egregious lengths Wlad was prepared to stink up the joint to get the win.

              Comment

              • Fury4daWIN
                takin' one for the team
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 3110
                • 156
                • 318
                • 2,222

                #37
                Originally posted by beez721
                besides the povetkin fiasco his clinching has not been to the point of dq worthy
                It has certainly been worthy of points deductions however.

                Comment

                • Fury4daWIN
                  takin' one for the team
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 3110
                  • 156
                  • 318
                  • 2,222

                  #38
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  really? he just clinched 100 times against jennings. you don't think 100 fouls is dq worthy? he clinched 45 times against pulev in 4 and a half rounds. seems to me that he clinches a lot in almost every fight. its just his style to cheat. the saddest part is that fans have become conditioned to it and now accept it. fans don't even realize what's happening right in front of their eyes. the cheating has become normal to them.
                  This is a good point. It's why the Povetkin fight was so retroactively damaging. It was an eye opening moment for many who'd become conditioned to accepting the unacceptable, myself included.

                  Comment

                  • M Bison
                    Perfect, but you're not
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 15677
                    • 600
                    • 798
                    • 32,424

                    #39
                    Wladimir is an illusion?
                    Well that's the only illusion I know that seems to be knocking a lot of people out cold lol.
                    Promotion rivals will always do this **** though, they're happy if it's their guy but will make excuses if it isn't, no idea what fight Roy was watching to think a rematch was needed lol.

                    Comment

                    • Fury4daWIN
                      takin' one for the team
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2015
                      • 3110
                      • 156
                      • 318
                      • 2,222

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Red Cyclone
                      Wladimir is an illusion?
                      Well that's the only illusion I know that seems to be knocking a lot of people out cold lol.
                      Promotion rivals will always do this **** though, they're happy if it's their guy but will make excuses if it isn't, no idea what fight Roy was watching to think a rematch was needed lol.
                      It's his degree of dominance that's an illusion, not the wins themselves. He's not nearly as far above the competition as people have thought, when the rules of the sport are actually enforced.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP