Who is the 2nd Best Heavyweight in the World

[KO'er]

You should add Tyson Fury to the poll.

[shinobi108]

Furys taller than Wlad, only a little bit slower, jab isnt as good either but he's got more to his game. He can move on his feet better than Wlad, he can fight southpaw and orthodox and the key difference he can come inside(past the jab) on wlad and challenge him inside like he's never been.

[removed]

Troll thread from the worst poster on this forum. Fury will embarrass Wlad when they eventually fight and the OP knows it, hence him deliberately leaving Fury out of the poll.

[LacedUp]

Tyson Fury is a sloppy giant suffering from Gigantism. I like that people have hopped on his train, but I personally wouldn't even give Wlad credit for beating, Ko'in him. It would be at the bottom of his best victories.

I like that TS left him out of the poll option. There is no way Tyson Fury lands anything of consequence on Wlad. He is simply gonna be a bigger target for Wlad, and the right hand will shine through in that fight. Wlad will treat him like Francesco Pianeta.

That is simply not true.

If you honestly believe that, then I feel sorry for you. You'd learn a lot of fight night.

We just saw Wlad have a few issues with a light punching guy with 30 fights his entire life pro and amateur, who started boxing at 24.

Facing a 6'9 guy who can box, punch and who moves well and doesn't get tired when the rounds go on, but gets better. Who doesn't a *** what Wlad is and would punch him in the nuts as soon as he tried to attempt a clinch.. It's an entirely different prospect.

Wlad also didn't show any power today whatsoever. I don't know why, maybe it just wasn't his night tonight.

[cupocity303]

That is simply not true.

If you honestly believe that, then I feel sorry for you. You'd learn a lot of fight night.

We just saw Wlad have a few issues with a light punching guy with 30 fights his entire life pro and amateur, who started boxing at 24.

Facing a 6'9 guy who can box, punch and who moves well and doesn't get tired when the rounds go on, but gets better.

I have no problem with your opinion. This will just make it harder for you to downplay Wlad's victory over Fury once that fight is over with. You may attempt a different angle by calling guys like me out, who have been downplaying Fury's abilities from the get-go, therefore asking why Wlad should get any credit if I didn't think much of Fury to begin with. To which I say, FINE. I don't defend Wlad from a "How many ATG or HOF-ers has he beat" standpoint anymore. It's pointless and tiring. It's a numbers game and it has to be at 64 total wins and running, with 18 Title defenses. There are not many Heavyweight around in the modern 2 or 3 fights per year era that are gonna get to 64 career wins. Not even in the lower divisions unless you're brought up in the Mexican circuit like Chavez Jr and Canelo.

All i'm saying is (and this is my prediction) that this will be a whitewash. Don't let tonights fight influence your thinking on what will happen against a supposedly better fighter in Fury. As dominant as Wlad was, he can't have a perfect night each and every time. But there is nothing to learn from this.

[Szef]

alexander povetkin.

[daggum]

wlad should have been dq'd against povetkin and jennings so first is between them. i would say povetkin first, jennings second, and fury third. wlad maybe 4th but he needs a good legit win to get back on top.

[Elroy1]

We all know it's Povetkin.

Pulev is better than the other 2 choices also.

[califo]

I have Wilder as the second.

[JACK1190]

I can't vote for none of the options that this English hating Irishman has given us.