Official: Dirrell-Jack, Jacobs-Truax & Undercards Discussion Thread!

[sicko]

[BOXEO _]

well your "regular motion" obviously isn't very good if you thinik calzaghe was landing. i knew he wasn't landing because i'm a perceptive fan but i needed confirmation and i got it. you said calzaghe outlanded hopkins by 90 punches. where is your evidence? i have mine. it's on youtube. all you have to do is watch it and count. in at least 7 rounds hopkins outlanded calzaghe easily. you are simply wrong. that's a fact. you just don't want to admit your wrong because you are stubborn.

You're wrong.


Ok, post the slow motion Calzaghe/Nard fight.


Lets watch it together and analyze

[El-blanco]

Disappointing night of fights

[Beercules]

You right.

When you put in two slick brothas, nobody will land.

Compubox after 5:

0 punches landed by either fighter. Both are putting on a boxing lesson.

I choked on my drink

[Bird1]

Not a lot of action but a good ending to the round by Jacobs. Think he will finish him

[LA_2_Vegas]

nice by jacobs.

[Rope_Burns]

[PulpFriction]

Jacobs looking sharp, Truax looking fatigued.

[Rope_Burns]

Shamrock vs Kimbo? Which youtube channel did they say that was going to be on?

[daggum]

You're wrong.


Ok, post the slow motion Calzaghe/Nard fight.


Lets watch it together and analyze

well it got taken down from youtube so i guess you can claim ignorance some more and pretend he was landing. the crowd is screaming he must be landing. even after watching it some calzageh fans suddenly change their story and say things like "calzaghe made hopkins tired in the later rounds" and that means he won the earlier rounds? lol no. or they will say "hopkins cheated and faked low blows" and that means he lost the fight how? or how about "calzageh made the fight, without calzaghe there would be no fight" a desperate attempt to ignore the fact hopkins outlanded calzaghe by a wide margin.