oh you had your own compubox stats? i didn't realize that. the fight was already broken down in slow motion and it was found that hopkins outlanded calzaghe by far and hopkins punches were obviously harder and cleaner to calzaghe's little slaps but who needs the truth? its on youtube if you want to see calzageh hitting hair but calzaghe clearly won right? as long as you think he's landing that's what countrs right? the guy coming forward and missing while walking into punches deserves to win right?
i believe the quote they used was "calzaghe wins? a very strange decision." its because they saw calzaghe hitting air and getting countered the entire fight but now you got people going around trying to revise history, pretending that calzaghe was landing, and quoting inaccurate compubox numbers. it's really sad.
well your "regular motion" obviously isn't very good if you thinik calzaghe was landing. i knew he wasn't landing because i'm a perceptive fan but i needed confirmation and i got it. you said calzaghe outlanded hopkins by 90 punches. where is your evidence? i have mine. it's on youtube. all you have to do is watch it and count. in at least 7 rounds hopkins outlanded calzaghe easily. you are simply wrong. that's a fact. you just don't want to admit your wrong because you are stubborn.
Comment