Oh jeez you don't think I know boxing now I am going to lose sleep. Am I also supposed to be worried about your ridiculous threats? I have never given a red k and if it makes you feel better you can give me one everyday until there are no more Red K's left to give. And guess what? I still won't give half a 5hit!! Honestly, some of you think entirely to highly of yourselves.
Comments Thread For: Photo: Klitschko, Holyfield Side By Side in New York
Collapse
-
-
Holyfield would have lost to Klitschko then been dismissed as a "bum" and "never was" by the USA chanters, ebony neoisraelite shamans and plain old geezers.
Not saying he WAS a bum, just that they would treat him the same way as any other Klitschko victim, I love it. He was a great fighter.Comment
-
-
The Holyfield that boxed and brawled in spots against Bowe in their second fight and the rematch with Lewis(a fresher younger version) would have a good shot against Klitschko. But the Holyfield that went to war like a crazy man like what he did in the first Bowe fight or against Foreman would get torpedoed easily by Wlad.Comment
-
Comment
-
Lennox beat Holyfield down twice. With that said reach was a issue for him. Wlad, would hurt Holyfield till it stopped.Holyfield showed in his career that size doesn't matter. Ability wise he fought guys just as good as Wlad in their prime multiple times like Lennox and Bowe and proved he was never in a mismatch.
Never was he in a mismatch in his career. Wlad hasn't fought anyone like Holyfield and it would be a good fight, not saying either man would win. But mismatch? Please.Comment
Comment