Yes, Ariza could have a case for fighters not wanting to work with him. Although I'm not sure how true that is when he is working with Mayweather.
But Roach's side will argue that Roach didn't accuse him of supplying steroids/PEDs to Pacquiao. They'll say because Ariza wouldn't disclose what was in the drinks, it could have been something that Pacquiao was allergic to and therefore might have hurt him in training and that was why they found him to be shady etc.
In the end Roach's side will win because Ariza's side doesn't have enough proof.
But Roach's side will argue that Roach didn't accuse him of supplying steroids/PEDs to Pacquiao. They'll say because Ariza wouldn't disclose what was in the drinks, it could have been something that Pacquiao was allergic to and therefore might have hurt him in training and that was why they found him to be shady etc.
In the end Roach's side will win because Ariza's side doesn't have enough proof.
Comment