Originally posted by SergioMartinez
View Post
But Roach's side will argue that Roach didn't accuse him of supplying steroids/PEDs to Pacquiao. They'll say because Ariza wouldn't disclose what was in the drinks, it could have been something that Pacquiao was allergic to and therefore might have hurt him in training and that was why they found him to be shady etc.
In the end Roach's side will win because Ariza's side doesn't have enough proof.
Comment