Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ROBBERY! PEDerson abuses Danny Garcia and gets no love on PBC

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Danny won the fight. It wasnt pretty but he did. Danny eked out 7 rounds. Peterson clearly won 5 rounds. Does not matter how close score was 7-5 DSG. Judges got this one right.

    Comment


    • #62
      peterson's gameplan ***ed him over, ******ed gameplan, just gave the fight away, when he could have handled garcia alot earlier

      anyway, he rose his stock

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by jaded View Post
        If you look at Garcia's face and Peterson's face at the finish you can see who won and lost.

        [IMG]http://i1343.***********.com/albums/o788/jadedz1/Peterson%20vs%20Garcia_zps0sxgekue.jpg[/IMG]
        That's right, look at the pics. That's how judges should score fights - look at the fighters' faces at the end of the fight. Forget about who won the majority of the rounds, just look at their faces and say "who got beat up the most??"

        Comment


        • #64
          It was an interesting fight in a boring way.

          I didn't think Lamont deserved to win with all the damn running he did before finally settling down in the final few rds to land more power punches.

          At the same time, Garcia didn't do jack to claim a win because he couldn't catch him.

          I think a draw would of been more appropriate even though neither deserved anything, lol. The only reason I would of given it to Garcia is because he wanted to make a fight out of it and Lamont didn't. At least not until rds 11 and 12.

          If the judges saw anything in favor of Garcia is that he was trying to give a show and Lamont didn't have any of that early on. Especially when PBC trying to get boxing up and running to the new generation. The last thing you want is a runner that favors into the boxing is boring stereotype, be it runners or holders.

          Real crappy fight that I had high expectations of a war.

          At least Lee-Quillen stole the show in the opener.

          Comment


          • #65
            Garcia won that fight. Lamont was backing up way too much and not throwing anything until the 8th round. I was surprised Lamon't corner felt like he was doing so well after the first half of the fight. They needed to tell him he needed to step it up earlier. Not sure why he waited so long. After the 8th round he was handling him and its not like Garcia was doing anything differently. To be the champ you have to beat the champ and Lamont didn't do enough to win last night.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by jas View Post

              You scored Canelo vs Lara for Canelo

              You clearly have an agenda

              Your scoring has no credibility I'm afraid
              LMAO.

              Scored it 7-5. Canelo was actually landing hard body shots. Danny didn't land anything close to the punches Canelo landed. As others have posted, he didn't have one significant punch in the entire fight.

              Those two fights are not as analogous as you might think either. Do you understand?

              You clearly have an agenda (or ADHD) by posting 32 times in this thread, and telling people they "dksab" because they don't have the same scorecard as you. Now that's an agenda. I have not insulted other people's cards; in fact, I have stated I understand how people could score early rounds for swift. I just don't agree with giving him 5-6 of the first 6-7 rounds. If you think about it, if you give Pederson 3 of the first 6-7 rounds, plus 5 of the last 6 rounds (which you did on "your card," that equals 8-4. (See Rafael's card for the first half of the fight.) There's not really much of a difference in the scoring, but you couldn't possibly wrap your mind around that idea.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                A KD doesn't have to be a 10-8 round. Considering the KD was more a trip than an actual KD, there's nothing wrong with scoring it 10-9.
                It doesn't?

                That's news to me.

                Comment


                • #68
                  With scoring, isn't it supposed to be a 9-9 (or 9-8 rather) round if one fighter gets knocked down but the round was otherwise dominated by the fighter who got knocked down?
                  Last edited by DeadLikeMe; 04-12-2015, 10:00 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    It doesn't?

                    That's news to me.
                    They touched on it. Said if the judge felt the fighter got up and got back into fight then 10-9 or 10-8 round is entirley up to them.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      It doesn't?

                      That's news to me.
                      Boxing experts and analysts are always mentioning this. Teddy Atlas, Max Kellerman, SRL, etc.

                      There is a preference amongst judges to award the fighter who scored the kd the round, but it is still discretionary.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP