Comments Thread For: IBF Clarify Kell Brook’s Voluntary Defense Position

[Chrismart]

Brooks is another British bum who will get exposed sooner rather than later just like his fellow countrymen (Hatton, Khan, Witter, Callzaghie, Frotch).

Calzaghe is Welsh.

[285Kid]

Who is the mandatory? Is the winner of Bradly/Vargas that mandatory?

[LacedUp]

Do you really have to be heavy handed to be risky? Skills?

This has pretty much been a mantra amongst khan fanboys since Garcia.

The answer is yes. You do. I say this as Khan prepares for his 5th featherfisted, overmatched, overrated opponent on the bounce.

Meanwhile, Kell Brook recently beat the future of the welterweight division. A win that was better than anything khan has done since Maidana.

[LacedUp]

Brook has been in stay busy fights since his pro debut.

Anybody remember "this year will be my year". This is the same guy who was mandatory for one title or another for 4 years or so.

And khan is in his 5th stay busy fight on the bounce. Hardly anything to be in awe about either. He's clearly guided away from anyone who can punch just a little.

Alexander/Urango doe

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Only Brookt ards can make excuses for Brook here. The guy is a FRAUD, he won't EVER fight anybody with a pulse until he gets that Khan retirement payday to secure him and his family. Khan won't give him that until he steps up and fights world class opponents. How on earth does the IBF have Frankie gavin so high, how did they have Kevin Bizier vs Jo Jo dan as the eliminator, it really is one corrupt organisation. Hearn clearly has ties with them.

He went to America and took the title off Shawn Porter. Khan, in the studio, said lets get the fight on and then backtracked like the lying snivelling sack of **** he is.