The rankings don't have a set formula like they should have. Nothing that can be scrutinised & petitioned externally. Basically it's at the Board's discretion, meaning they just decide based on the own criteria.
Khan's fought a washed up WW and an ex Jnr. WW champ. Both good performances, but how does that make Khan a better prospect than Bradley, Maidana, Porter, Rios & Chaves. They've all faced stiffer competition at WW and many have fewer looses on the their record than Khan. Most importantly, each would be a VERY difficult fight for Khan, much more so than the fights he's taken at WW. The WBC ranking is bogus.
Floyd / Manny .... blah blah. Neither will ever fight anybody again for less than $50 mil and Khan doesn't bring those figures. They'll fight each other again for an even bigger purse.
Khan's fought a washed up WW and an ex Jnr. WW champ. Both good performances, but how does that make Khan a better prospect than Bradley, Maidana, Porter, Rios & Chaves. They've all faced stiffer competition at WW and many have fewer looses on the their record than Khan. Most importantly, each would be a VERY difficult fight for Khan, much more so than the fights he's taken at WW. The WBC ranking is bogus.
Floyd / Manny .... blah blah. Neither will ever fight anybody again for less than $50 mil and Khan doesn't bring those figures. They'll fight each other again for an even bigger purse.
Comment