Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golovkin Can Duck Opponents By Using The "Not a PPV Fight" Excuse?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
    It's why professors ban wikipedia as a source, people don't know how to read it. It says one thing, and kids run with it and give out false information. This kid googled Monaco to prove a point on here, wikipedia'ed it, saw it says it's a "Principality, microstate, city-state" and immediately just came in here for some green k for potentially owning someone with his wikipedia source.
    speaking of principalities.

    jamie is going to dorne. saw it on the hbo commercial. LOL

    Comment


    • #82
      Why only make a thread about #4? It was his ranking of his top 5 fights that he wants, in order. He said #1 is Cotto because he's the lineal champ, the WBC champ, he wants to become the lineal champ at 160 and unify and that is his priority, his #1 goal. Canelo #2 because he thinks it would be an awesome fight for the fans, #3 Chavez because it's a PPV fight, #4 Ward says what you posted and #5 was Quillin.

      This was a list of the top 5 guys he wants to fight. He ranked them in order, 1 through 5, in which he prioritized them. He's talking about Ward doesn't make sense right now, but it will next year after he unifies 160 and fights Cotto (he likely wont get Cotto but that is who HE wants the most).
      Last edited by ИATAS; 03-20-2015, 04:04 PM.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
        He's never gonna headline a ppv until one of these ppv names sacks up: Cotto, Canelo, Chavez. With Cotto at least he's mando, so even if Cotto vacates he's due that belt
        If Cotto vacates the belt it means nothing anymore. If Cotto gets stripped or vacates the belt becomes meaningless because it ends the linage and it leaves the division without a champ.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
          Why only make a thread about #4? It was his ranking of his top 5 fights that he wants, in order. He said #1 is Cotto because he's the lineal champ, the WBC champ, he wants to become the lineal champ at 160 and unify and that is his priority, his #1 goal. Canelo #2 because he thinks it would be an awesome fight for the fans, #3 Chavez because it's a PPV fight, #4 Ward says what you posted and #5 was Quillin if I remember correctly. This was a list of the top 5 guys he wants to fight. He's talking about Ward doesn't make sense right now, but it will next year after he unifies 160 and fights Cotto (he likely wont get Cotto but that is who HE wants the most).
          He never says he wants them because from what i read he only wants Cotto next. He says no to Ward, Quilin. Yes to Chavez, yes to Canelo after he first gets a PPV fight and yes to Cotto. seems to me like he ducks Ward and Quilin.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
            Funniest part is that after his wikipedia discovery, where he thought he learned something new, he came in here like "Learn the difference!". But you could tell he JUST read that ****

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by AnimalisticMeth View Post
              Richest country and they can bearly fill a bingo hall with 40 people. If i stage a fight in the richesst country in the world I hope I atleast get 5k on the arena.
              lol it's not a bingo hall, that place has a retractable roof.

              Last edited by Weebler I; 03-20-2015, 04:11 PM.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by AnimalisticMeth View Post
                If Cotto vacates the belt it means nothing anymore. If Cotto gets stripped or vacates the belt becomes meaningless because it ends the linage and it leaves the division without a champ.
                Its still one more belt, and if #2 guy sacks up (say Lee beats Quillin), new lineage. Or unify all belts, new lineage etc. He can get the Ring belt fighting anyone top 5 iirc

                Comment


                • #88
                  He scared doe

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
                    Why only make a thread about #4? It was his ranking of his top 5 fights that he wants, in order. He said #1 is Cotto because he's the lineal champ, the WBC champ, he wants to become the lineal champ at 160 and unify and that is his priority, his #1 goal. Canelo #2 because he thinks it would be an awesome fight for the fans, #3 Chavez because it's a PPV fight, #4 Ward says what you posted and #5 was Quillin.

                    This was a list of the top 5 guys he wants to fight. He ranked them in order, 1 through 5, in which he prioritized them. He's talking about Ward doesn't make sense right now, but it will next year after he unifies 160 and fights Cotto (he likely wont get Cotto but that is who HE wants the most).
                    He never ranks them. I bet the website did that on his own. The man has problems listing things he likes in order and we are to take he gave that list on his own when he basically says he doesnt want to fight 2 of the guys in the list? Where is Mayweather on that list? he said he would go to 154.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      He's never gonna headline a ppv until one of these ppv names sacks up: Cotto, Canelo, Chavez. With Cotto at least he's mando, so even if Cotto vacates he's due that belt
                      So GGG needs cotto, canelo or chavez "to be ppv" cuz "hes never gonna headline a ppv" without them.

                      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      "the ward fight doesn't make financial sense"

                      cut the bullsh^t

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP