Klitschko MUST fight Wilder

[$£X]

For these reasons, Klitschko MUST fight Wilder soon:

1: He got a belt.
2: He is undefeated.
3: He got 32 KOs in 33 wins.
4: He is highly ranked.
5: He is big, young and in great shape.

There is no one else in the division that poses a threat to Wladimir and honestly, I think Wladimir should do his best to make this fight happen. Especially if Wilder destroys Fury first. Wilder would make a great addition to Wladimir's legacy. And even IF Wilder won, then we would all have gotten a testimony to Wladimir's courage for taking the most dangerous fight possible at the moment.

[removed]

1) Yes, he holds a paper belt.
2) Undefeated due to fighting an army of tomato cans.
3) See above.
4) I'd like to thank Al Haymon.
5) Chicken legs.

Tyson Fury is the only man with the tools to defeat Wlad.

[$£X]

1) Yes, he holds a paper belt.
2) Undefeated due to fighting an army of tomato cans.
3) See above.
4) I'd like to thank Al Haymon.
5) Chicken legs.

Tyson Fury is the only man with the tools to defeat Wlad.

1) It's a real belt from beating Stiverne, who was a respectable opponent.
2) He did fight tomato cans. Except Scott and especially Stiverne. He beat them all, though. Easily.
3) See above.
4) Who cares who to thank, he's highly ranked.
5) Chicken legs? WTF.

To me, it seems like you're scared of Wladimir taking this fight. Come on, who else would you like to see him fight? Fury? Fury has yet to beat a guy like Stiverne...

[Ryn0]

I don't think Wilder is even 3rd best at Heavyweight. Fury is better, Povetkin is better, Klitschko is obviously better. I'd wager Tony Thompson is better also, Chisora would give the dude a run for his money if he fought him the same way he fought Vitali.

**** average fighter with an admittedly dynamite right hand and an OK jab.

[$£X]

I don't think Wilder is even 3rd best at Heavyweight. Fury is better, Povetkin is better, Klitschko is obviously better. I'd wager Tony Thompson is better also, Chisora would give the dude a run for his money if he fought him the same way he fought Vitali.

**** average fighter with an admittedly dynamite right hand and an OK jab.

Come on, Thompson and Chisora would get destroyed by both Klitschko, Wilder, Povetkin and Fury.

[Ryn0]

What makes you say that? Wilders incredible level of competition? The vast swathes of talent he has displayed against whom?

Wilders only win of any significance is Stiverne who is on the wrong side of 30 and won a vacant title from Chris Arreola. If he fought Tony Thompson and won it would be the best win on his record.

[Mooshashi]

There is only one reason for this fight to happen and it's a good reason: $

I think it could be hyped up to be a big fight..."Finally a real chance for the USA to take back the
HW crown ".

Wilder is a good interview. ..he and Wlad would look great on TV shows hyping the fight. Go on late night talk shows like Ali used to do. Get the casual boxing fan thinking that Wilder is the next Tyson.

It would make more $£ than a Fury -Wlad fight, if properly promoted.

[removed]

1) It's a real belt from beating Stiverne, who was a respectable opponent.
2) He did fight tomato cans. Except Scott and especially Stiverne. He beat them all, though. Easily.
3) See above.
4) Who cares who to thank, he's highly ranked.
5) Chicken legs? WTF.

To me, it seems like you're scared of Wladimir taking this fight. Come on, who else would you like to see him fight? Fury? Fury has yet to beat a guy like Stiverne...

Stiverne is absolute garbage, at least the version that Wilder fought is. Fury would destroy him.

I don't have a problem with the Wilder-Wlad fight, however i think there's fighters out there who deserve the shot more. Fury, who's resume ****'s all over Wilders, or Povetkin, who has been knocking out very good opposition.

[NEETzsche]

wilder is more likely to duck wlad than the other way round

[Rip Chudd]

Stiverne is absolute garbage, at least the version that Wilder fought is. Fury would destroy him.

I don't have a problem with the Wilder-Wlad fight, however i think there's fighters out there who deserve the shot more. Fury, who's resume ****'s all over Wilders, or Povetkin, who has been knocking out very good opposition.

How do you figure that? Fury's resume is just as bad and Wilder has the best win out of both.