Comments Thread For: Ellerbe, Koncz Trade Verbal Shots Over $5 Million Fine

[MDPopescu]

USADA won't cancel the bout if someone is caught dirty.

Anderson Silva tested positive for PEDs and USADA did not announce he was dirty until after the tickets and PPVs were sold.

It's fine if they announce the positive tests after the fight -- the guilty party will still have to pay damages to the other party... And if both parties are involved, pray God for you to ever find out the truth...

[Rath]

I'm not a Mayweather's fan boy... Did anybody sue them?

of course i know you are not. you are one of the few poster here i would never dare cross.

i ask because you seem to have a good grasp of the law. and from what you said the imposition of the ban is only when somebody sues Bey and Love.

got it thanks

[Marvellous1]

Is enough to do what?

Did Ellerbe release this to the press? I have no idea. There's some Ellerbe quotes throughout this thread in bold letters that are obviously making reference to drug cheating without straight up saying it. For all I know, these quotes were made up by overzealous fans and I fell for it.

Enough to reassure people that Pacquiao is clean. That is your assertion for the $5 million fine being suggested, right?

The opening article made it seem like Koncz released the offer to the press, especially Ellerbe and Mayweather's refusal (knowing some would spin it like some here have). Ellerbe responded stating that a severe enough punishment was already in place, and agreed by both parties.

Is this not what happened?

[ReIoaded]

It's fine if they announce the positive tests after the fight -- the guilty party will still have to pay damages to the other party... And if both parties are involved, pray God for you to ever find out the truth...

I hope they're both juiced to the gills for this fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

USADA won't cancel the bout if someone is caught dirty.

Anderson Silva tested positive for PEDs and USADA did not announce he was dirty until after the tickets and PPVs were sold.

I don't think Silva was tested by USADA.

[Kagami Taiga]

i see a bunch of idiots talking about what they dont understand. Koncz was wrong ellerbe was right. even arum said so, which says a lot. if there were to be a penaalty ofr breach of contract on failing the drug test, the 5mil would serve to limit the liability of the party that tested positive. there really is no reason for such a low penalty for such a huge business venture. the party that does fail the test will be on the hook for hundreds of millions regardless.

[MDPopescu]

of course i know you are not. you are one of the few poster here i would never dare cross.

i ask because you seem to have a good grasp of the law. and from what you said the imposition of the ban is only when somebody sues Bey and Love.

got it thanks

I'm not a lawyer -- don't take my word as "authoritative"...
But I live in a extremely corrupt country... That is why I was forced to closely follow the judicial system (at home AND abroad)...

[ReIoaded]

I don't think Silva was tested by USADA.

You're probably right.

[ReIoaded]

i see a bunch of idiots talking about what they dont understand. Koncz was wrong ellerbe was right. even arum said so, which says a lot. if there were to be a penaalty ofr breach of contract on failing the drug test, the 5mil would serve to limit the liability of the party that tested positive. there really is no reason for such a low penalty for such a huge business venture. the party that does fail the test will be on the hook for hundreds of millions regardless.

Ladies and Gentlemen... Bobby Shmurda.

[Rath]

i see a bunch of idiots talking about what they dont understand. Koncz was wrong ellerbe was right. even arum said so, which says a lot. if there were to be a penaalty ofr breach of contract on failing the drug test, the 5mil would serve to limit the liability of the party that tested positive. there really is no reason for such a low penalty for such a huge business venture. the party that does fail the test will be on the hook for hundreds of millions regardless.

this is what i have been waiting almost forever and now someone use the term "breach of contract" if there was no agreement that one can call off the fight if the other one fails the drug test what exactly in the contract does the one who fails the test breach?