Comments Thread For: Ellerbe, Koncz Trade Verbal Shots Over $5 Million Fine

[Fetta]

here it is FETA

So your opinion is what you wanted to show me

[SchoolTheseCats]

here it is FETA

It would limit liability to just the 5mil fine imposed in contract terms wouldn't be able to sue on top of that which would be dumb bro when you can sue for way more then 5mil

[Rath]

Or, Mayweather does not want to risk losing $115mil+, by limiting the litigation to $5mil, should Pacquiao test positive.

Yep, its one of the two

just for the sake of argument what are you going to sue Pac's team for?

[Rath]

So your opinion is what you wanted to show me

then tell me where i am wrong or better yet present your case

[jjsmyth87]

Well Berto accused Ortiz and did Peterson accused Khan as well and they both demanded the testing.

It is a common tactic by the guilty

Exactly! And its the same thing jean Pascal just did to kovalev who in turn called his bluff and Pascal backed down lol can you believe these people? Pascal also has angel heredia on his team

[Fetta]

then tell me where i am wrong or better yet present your case

My case is they arent running from the 5 million penalty but letting it be known if Pac comes up positive they will sue for more.

5 million is alot, alot of money but not to these 2.

I dont think either will be come up dirty though.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Exactly! And its the same thing jean Pascal just did to kovalev who in turn called his bluff and Pascal backed down lol can you believe these people? Pascal also has angel heredia on his team

You do know berto positive test was from something tainted digested and in turn was thrown out as a positive result

[Rath]

My case is they arent running from the 5 million penalty but letting it be known if Pac comes up positive they will sue for more.

5 million is alot, alot of money but not to these 2.

I dont think either will be come up dirty though.

but what are you going to sue Pac for if it's not on the contract?

You could only sue Pac Team if they broke any agreement in the contract yes?

On the topic:

The article says Koncz said Mayweather rejected the 5 million penalty applied to both fighters for being caught with banned substance, true or false?

Did Ellerbe says it is not true or he just deflected the accusation true or false?

[arraamis]

http://www.maxboxing.com/news/max-bo...-mess-part-one

On May 20, 2012, a rumor filtered through the drug-testing community that Mayweather had tested positive on three occasions for an illegal performance-enhancing drug.

More specifically, it was rumored that Mayweather’s “A” sample had tested positive on three occasions and, after each positive test, USADA had found exceptional circumstances in the form of inadvertent use and gave Floyd a waiver. This waiver, according to the rumor, negated the need for a test of Floyd’s “B” sample. And because the “B” sample was never tested, a loophole in USADA’s contract with Mayweather and Golden Boy allowed the testing to proceed without the positive “A” sample results being reported to Mayweather’s opponent or the Nevada State Athletic Commission (which had jurisdiction over the fights).

In late-May, Pacquiao’s attorneys heard the rumor. On June 4, 2012, they served document demands and subpoenas on Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy and USADA calling for the production of all documents that related to PED testing of Mayweather for the Shane Mosley, Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto fights.

The documents were not produced. There was a delay in the proceedings while Floyd spent nine weeks in the Clark County Detention Center after pleading guilty to charges of domestic violence and harassment. Upon his release from jail on August 2nd, settlement talks heated up.

On September 25, 2012, a stipulation of settlement ending the defamation case was filed with the court. The parties agreed that the terms of settlement would be kept confidential. Prior to the agreement being signed, two sources with detailed knowledge of the proceedings told this writer that Mayweather’s initial monetary settlement offer was “substantially more” than Pacquiao’s attorneys had expected it would be and an agreement in principle was reached soon afterward.

Dude are you seriously ******ed??????

You didn't even read what you posted .......


I'll help you out KEYWORD = "RUMORED"

[jjsmyth87]

It would limit liability to just the 5mil fine imposed in contract terms wouldn't be able to sue on top of that which would be dumb bro when you can sue for way more then 5mil

I doubt they could sue for more than that considering they are hardly spending q nickel on promotion for this fight. They're going to have 2 press conferences and a weigh in and they are reserving the MGM grand, I highly doubt all of that comes anywhere close to being even a couple million let alone 5 million.

What you Floyd semen garglers dont understand is that Ellerbe is saying that because they could be banned from the sport for 4 years, that should be enough of a deterrent. I really don't see it that way, because after all those bs demands of mayweather and his team, they are now refusing the fine in addition to the ban. Has anyone heard of a promoter being sued for more than 5 million for a fighter failing a drug test? I highly doubt they would get 5 million of either of them failed.