Julio Cesar Chavez-Meldrick Taylor I remembered
By Lee Groves
Part 1
There are certain fights throughout boxing history that ignite a visceral reaction. All that is needed to light the fuse are two hyphenated words.
Tunney-Dempsey II is one such fight. One side says that Tunney should have been counted out because he was on the floor for 14 seconds while others believe Dempsey's failure to obey the newly-adopted 'neutral corner' rule, and referee Dave Barry's adherence to it, legitimately gave Tunney precious extra seconds to recover.
Mention Leonard-Hagler' and the long knives come out. Fans of the Marvelous One' say their man was robbed by judges who were dazzled by Leonard's late-round bursts and blinded by his showmanship while Sugar Ray's adherents point out that Hagler virtually ceded the first four rounds due to ineffective aggression and didn't win enough of the remaining stanzas to merit the decision.
Even though Tunney and Dempsey are long dead and Leonard and Hagler are 58 and 60 years old respectively, the debates surrounding their fights burn as brightly as ever. Opinions on both sides are so deeply held that they almost become a part of that person. Like ******* versus conservative, a change of mind would be equated to an act of treason.
Another such fight took place 25 years ago today when Julio Cesar Chavez and Meldrick Taylor produced a war for the ages that would be overshadowed by one of the most polarizing decisions a referee ever made.
The moment Richard Steele waved his arms in front of Taylor's face with just two seconds remaining in the scheduled 12-rounder three lives were instantly transformed. Taylor -who would have won a split decision had the final bell sounded -instead suffered his first defeat, a defeat that would set into motion aprecipitous and ultimately ruinous decline. Conversely, Chavez escaped his first defeat and ran his record to 67-0. That historic unbeaten streak eventually stretched to 90 fights before Frankie Randall finally broke the string nearly four years later. For Steele, the effects weren't immediately felt. At first he was hailed as a humanitarian who put Taylor's long-term health over competitive considerations but after he stopped the first Mike Tyson-Donovan 'Razor' Ruddock fight a year later, his actions in Chavez-Taylor I were used as the foundation for a negative narrative that would result in his getting vociferously booed for years afterward.
Taylor's supporters contend their man should have been given the benefit of the doubt because of the short time remaining in the bout as well as his previous dominance while those who back Chavez (and Steele) argue the fight was stopped properly because a battered and momentarily distracted Taylor failed to properly respond to Steele's direct questions.
What is beyond question was that Chavez-Taylor I was a definitive example of what makes boxing such a compelling sport ; constant two-way action, continuous shifts of fortune and an explosive conclusion.
Up until that conclusion, the fight exceeded even the loftiest of expectations and in the wake of Buster Douglas's mammoth upset of Mike Tyson a month earlier the sport couldn't have asked for a more memorable entry into the 1990s.
This was a fight several years in the making and in the boxing world the anticipation was high. And why not? On paper, Chavez-Taylor I was as magnificent a pairing as could be made in the sport, both in terms of physical assets and the meshing of styles. On the former, at 5-foot-7 and owning a 66½-inch reach Chavez held one-half inch edges in both categories, which virtually ensured that talent and courage, not overwhelming structural advantages, would identify the superior fighter that night.
On the latter, while Chavez was capable of long-range boxing (see the Rocky Lockridge fight for proof), his reputation was built on aggression, determination, splendid infighting, pinpoint accuracy and a chin that rivals diamonds for its hardness. The Mexican was the latest personification of a national heritage that counts Ruben Olivares, Carlos Zarate, Pipino Cuevas and Vicente Saldivar among others as its heroes and his technical prowess served to further polish his country's fistic status.
By Lee Groves
Part 1
There are certain fights throughout boxing history that ignite a visceral reaction. All that is needed to light the fuse are two hyphenated words.
Tunney-Dempsey II is one such fight. One side says that Tunney should have been counted out because he was on the floor for 14 seconds while others believe Dempsey's failure to obey the newly-adopted 'neutral corner' rule, and referee Dave Barry's adherence to it, legitimately gave Tunney precious extra seconds to recover.
Mention Leonard-Hagler' and the long knives come out. Fans of the Marvelous One' say their man was robbed by judges who were dazzled by Leonard's late-round bursts and blinded by his showmanship while Sugar Ray's adherents point out that Hagler virtually ceded the first four rounds due to ineffective aggression and didn't win enough of the remaining stanzas to merit the decision.
Even though Tunney and Dempsey are long dead and Leonard and Hagler are 58 and 60 years old respectively, the debates surrounding their fights burn as brightly as ever. Opinions on both sides are so deeply held that they almost become a part of that person. Like ******* versus conservative, a change of mind would be equated to an act of treason.
Another such fight took place 25 years ago today when Julio Cesar Chavez and Meldrick Taylor produced a war for the ages that would be overshadowed by one of the most polarizing decisions a referee ever made.
The moment Richard Steele waved his arms in front of Taylor's face with just two seconds remaining in the scheduled 12-rounder three lives were instantly transformed. Taylor -who would have won a split decision had the final bell sounded -instead suffered his first defeat, a defeat that would set into motion aprecipitous and ultimately ruinous decline. Conversely, Chavez escaped his first defeat and ran his record to 67-0. That historic unbeaten streak eventually stretched to 90 fights before Frankie Randall finally broke the string nearly four years later. For Steele, the effects weren't immediately felt. At first he was hailed as a humanitarian who put Taylor's long-term health over competitive considerations but after he stopped the first Mike Tyson-Donovan 'Razor' Ruddock fight a year later, his actions in Chavez-Taylor I were used as the foundation for a negative narrative that would result in his getting vociferously booed for years afterward.
Taylor's supporters contend their man should have been given the benefit of the doubt because of the short time remaining in the bout as well as his previous dominance while those who back Chavez (and Steele) argue the fight was stopped properly because a battered and momentarily distracted Taylor failed to properly respond to Steele's direct questions.
What is beyond question was that Chavez-Taylor I was a definitive example of what makes boxing such a compelling sport ; constant two-way action, continuous shifts of fortune and an explosive conclusion.
Up until that conclusion, the fight exceeded even the loftiest of expectations and in the wake of Buster Douglas's mammoth upset of Mike Tyson a month earlier the sport couldn't have asked for a more memorable entry into the 1990s.
This was a fight several years in the making and in the boxing world the anticipation was high. And why not? On paper, Chavez-Taylor I was as magnificent a pairing as could be made in the sport, both in terms of physical assets and the meshing of styles. On the former, at 5-foot-7 and owning a 66½-inch reach Chavez held one-half inch edges in both categories, which virtually ensured that talent and courage, not overwhelming structural advantages, would identify the superior fighter that night.
On the latter, while Chavez was capable of long-range boxing (see the Rocky Lockridge fight for proof), his reputation was built on aggression, determination, splendid infighting, pinpoint accuracy and a chin that rivals diamonds for its hardness. The Mexican was the latest personification of a national heritage that counts Ruben Olivares, Carlos Zarate, Pipino Cuevas and Vicente Saldivar among others as its heroes and his technical prowess served to further polish his country's fistic status.
Comment