Who would have won back then?
Floyd Mayweather vs. Ricky Hatton @ 140 in 2005.
Collapse
-
-
-
Floyd would have ended Hatton's career. In 2005, at 140, was Floyd AT HIS ABSOLUTE BEST. Speed, Power in both hands, chin defense, reflexes everything you want in a fighter.Comment
-
Stoppage around the 6th round. Mayweather was too dangerous at that weight, it was a pity they didn't meet in 2005, even when they both fought at 147 I see two 140 fighters who weren't really fully fledged welterweights fighting there.Comment
-
Hatton wouldn't beat Floyd at any weight or under any circumstances barring Floyd illness or injury. If they fought 10 times Floyd would win all 10 fights many of which by stoppage.Comment
-
-
Floyd wins all hypotheticals buddy. No matter what ..lol
Hatton definately is more competitive at his better weight.
*****s will say any weight floyd stops him. Not true. At 140 where hatton was stronger he does more damage.
at 147 collazo showed hatton wasnt the same.before floyd got him.
He looked fat at 147.140 is a more competitive fight.Comment
-
Excuses are usual, Mayweather in 2005 was not a welterweight just like Hatton, his best weight was at 140 just like Hatton.Floyd wins all hypotheticals buddy. No matter what ..lol
Hatton definately is more competitive at his better weight.
*****s will say any weight floyd stops him. Not true. At 140 where hatton was stronger he does more damage.
at 147 collazo showed hatton wasnt the same.before floyd got him.
He looked fat at 147.140 is a more competitive fight.Comment

Comment