Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Mayweather Can Run, But He Can't Hide

[D4thincarnation]

LMFAO, you use the middle judge? So the other ones are full of shyt then? What makes the middle judge so important, he's right and the other 2 don't matter? You're a joke dude, lol, talking about straight up just won and lost rds in an argument holds no weight kid, go back to boxing 101.

Because they are the middle, it also helps to eliminate extreme scores.

The fact is Pacquiao is better at winning rounds that Mayweather.

My argument is based on the facts, yours is just your opinion.

[D4thincarnation]

Which is why both got rematches.

45-2 then

[b Murphington]

Because they are the middle, it also helps to eliminate extreme scores.

The fact is Pacquiao is better at winning rounds that Mayweather.

My argument is based on the facts, yours is just your opinion.

Bro, STFU about your "facts." LOL. A fight is subjective by nature. Your argument is so flawed and idiotic I can smash everything your main point is about in one post. Just looking at rds won and rds lost doesn't mean shyt. You're not taking into account the real things that matter such as how the rds played out. The result of a rd is just that, a result. You don't see what took place to get there. Was a fighter hurt? Who landed more? Who landed the most effective punch that rd? Who took over the rd late? Who has more left in the tank at the end of the rd? Most importantly, how close was the rd? You're just looking at numbers that don't mean a whole lot. Cuz those numbers you talk about are controversial at best. Think about swing rds. I can take 15 rounds that the "judges" believe that Pacquiao won and say that he lost and vice versa, and do the same for Floyd, easily because they were that competitive.

GTFO your "facts" at the end of the day are meaningless. You're basing everything off of the ends, not the means. And in boxing the means are what matter. Hell, I'm gonna guess half of these fights you never even watched! LOL! You're just looking up scores without even watching the fights! You don't even talk about the fighters themselves you're just struggling to find leverage in your argument and so you bring up these numbers that as I just proved, don't hold weight. Your facts may be facts, but just cuz their facts, don't mean they hold a lot of weight. Please go follow a different sport cuz you just don't get boxing.

[D4thincarnation]

Bro, STFU about your "facts." LOL. A fight is subjective by nature. Your argument is so flawed and idiotic I can smash everything your main point is about in one post. Just looking at rds won and rds lost doesn't mean shyt. You're not taking into account the real things that matter such as how the rds played out. The result of a rd is just that, a result. You don't see what took place to get there. Was a fighter hurt? Who landed more? Who landed the most effective punch that rd? Who took over the rd late? Who has more left in the tank at the end of the rd? Most importantly, how close was the rd? You're just looking at numbers that don't mean a whole lot. Cuz those numbers you talk about are controversial at best. Think about swing rds. I can take 15 rounds that the "judges" believe that Pacquiao won and say that he lost and vice versa, and do the same for Floyd, easily because they were that competitive.

GTFO your "facts" at the end of the day are meaningless. You're basing everything off of the ends, not the means. And in boxing the means are what matter. Hell, I'm gonna guess half of these fights you never even watched! LOL! You're just looking up scores without even watching the fights! You don't even talk about the fighters themselves you're just struggling to find leverage in your argument and so you bring up these numbers that as I just proved, don't hold weight. Your facts may be facts, but just cuz their facts, don't mean they hold a lot of weight. Please go follow a different sport cuz you just don't get boxing.

I've seen the fights the facts support my view not yours.

Pacquiao wins more rounds more clearly and is more dominant in those rounds.

[hitking]

45-2 then

Doesn't make a f.uck'n difference to me homie. My life isn't defined by Floyd's success the way yours, and folks like you's lives are defined by Floyd's failures.

Just curious. According to your logic, Floyd-DLH was as close as a prize fight can be with one man being awarded a victory. At that time, it was the highest grossing fight in boxing history. If that fight was s legitimate SD victory for Floyd, combined with it being the biggest fight in boxing history, why was there sucg backlash when a rematch was announced? If there were ever a fight that demanded a rematch, it was that one, right?

[HookequalsKO]

Bro, STFU about your "facts." LOL. A fight is subjective by nature. Your argument is so flawed and idiotic I can smash everything your main point is about in one post. Just looking at rds won and rds lost doesn't mean shyt. You're not taking into account the real things that matter such as how the rds played out. The result of a rd is just that, a result. You don't see what took place to get there. Was a fighter hurt? Who landed more? Who landed the most effective punch that rd? Who took over the rd late? Who has more left in the tank at the end of the rd? Most importantly, how close was the rd? You're just looking at numbers that don't mean a whole lot. Cuz those numbers you talk about are controversial at best. Think about swing rds. I can take 15 rounds that the "judges" believe that Pacquiao won and say that he lost and vice versa, and do the same for Floyd, easily because they were that competitive.

GTFO your "facts" at the end of the day are meaningless. You're basing everything off of the ends, not the means. And in boxing the means are what matter. Hell, I'm gonna guess half of these fights you never even watched! LOL! You're just looking up scores without even watching the fights! You don't even talk about the fighters themselves you're just struggling to find leverage in your argument and so you bring up these numbers that as I just proved, don't hold weight. Your facts may be facts, but just cuz their facts, don't mean they hold a lot of weight. Please go follow a different sport cuz you just don't get boxing.

This is exactly why I told him I was done with him. You just exposed him and he still views **** from a "I just don't like Floyd" point of view

[P.Esco]

It is not my opinion, it is the facts.

Because they are the middle, it also helps to eliminate extreme scores.

The fact is Pacquiao is better at winning rounds that Mayweather.

My argument is based on the facts, yours is just your opinion.

I thought my assessment was waay better. I used there previous 4 fights which took place over a 2 year span for both, both included fights against average good and elite competition, and on all i used scorecards that the public perceived.

[D4thincarnation]

Doesn't make a f.uck'n difference to me homie. My life isn't defined by Floyd's success the way yours, and folks like you's lives are defined by Floyd's failures.

Just curious. According to your logic, Floyd-DLH was as close as a prize fight can be with one man being awarded a victory. At that time, it was the highest grossing fight in boxing history. If that fight was s legitimate SD victory for Floyd, combined with it being the biggest fight in boxing history, why was there sucg backlash when a rematch was announced? If there were ever a fight that demanded a rematch, it was that one, right?

I wanted to see Floyd face Margarito or Williams, Oscar was a part boxer when he faced Floyd. One previously fight in 3 years.

[hitking]

Bro, STFU about your "facts." LOL. A fight is subjective by nature. Your argument is so flawed and idiotic I can smash everything your main point is about in one post. Just looking at rds won and rds lost doesn't mean shyt. You're not taking into account the real things that matter such as how the rds played out. The result of a rd is just that, a result. You don't see what took place to get there. Was a fighter hurt? Who landed more? Who landed the most effective punch that rd? Who took over the rd late? Who has more left in the tank at the end of the rd? Most importantly, how close was the rd? You're just looking at numbers that don't mean a whole lot. Cuz those numbers you talk about are controversial at best. Think about swing rds. I can take 15 rounds that the "judges" believe that Pacquiao won and say that he lost and vice versa, and do the same for Floyd, easily because they were that competitive.

GTFO your "facts" at the end of the day are meaningless. You're basing everything off of the ends, not the means. And in boxing the means are what matter. Hell, I'm gonna guess half of these fights you never even watched! LOL! You're just looking up scores without even watching the fights! You don't even talk about the fighters themselves you're just struggling to find leverage in your argument and so you bring up these numbers that as I just proved, don't hold weight. Your facts may be facts, but just cuz their facts, don't mean they hold a lot of weight. Please go follow a different sport cuz you just don't get boxing.

This dude is f.uck'n ******ed homie. His "facts" are based on eliminating 2/3 of the official result in a fight. I've come across some ****** muthaf.uckaz on the site. He's creeping dangerously close to #1 today though.

[hitking]

I wanted to see Floyd face Margarito or Williams, Oscar was a part boxer when he faced Floyd. One previously fight in 3 years.

Ah OK. Williams makes since seeing how he had just beaten Margarito. Don't understand wanting to see him fight Margarito over argubly the top jr middleweight in the game, who had just taken him to SD. Unless of course you put a lot more stock in that comeback win over Golden Johnson than I did.