Originally posted by El-blanco
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Mayweather Maybe Wins 5 Years Ago, Not Now
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostSimilar to what I said were stated by Floyd and his fans after the following fights:
- Maidana: He is too dirty. Ref had a bad night. He bit Floyd's pinky.
- Cotto: Floyd had the sniffles.
- Castillo: Floyd was fighting hurt.
- Every fight: Floyd uses his style (ie. passive) because his hands hurt him.
- Many fights: It took time for Floyd to adjust.
- Marquez vs Manny: Many Floyd fans say that Marquez must of won fight numbers 1 and/or 2 and/or 3 but don't talk that way when we saw Castillo dominate Floyd relatively speaking ..... so come May 2nd, you know what time it is.
Recent thread, Floyd fans were saying that Manny would more than likely win a close fight due to Arum and other reasons...... so come May 2nd, you know what time it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostEven Pinoys said Marquez won the 3rd fight so much that Manny held a press conference to denounce anyone who is Pinoy and doesn't say he won. Plenty of Floyd fans acknowledge that Castillo 1 was either close, a draw, win for either or Mayweather barely took it but Floyd fans have the rematch to fall back on unlike Pacquiao with Marquez. Speaking for myself I have no history of posting excuses but I could make a hard cover book out of all the excuses Pacquiao fans make for him and his opponents.
BTW - Manny is 2-1-1 against Marquez and was also winning #4. Yes, you did just remind me of the other excuse Floyd fans make ..... but Floyd won the rematch!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by fabie View PostThat's the keyword in there...it doesn't mean it's an outright and flat out "losing". MAYBE...the fact that they didn't fight it's just pure speculation.
That's akin to saying Mayweather would school Pacquiao because Marquez KO'ed Pac...linear thinking doesn't necessarily transcend. LOGIC AND RATIONAL just doesn't happen on the ring all the time.
Otherwise encumbent champions would always be champions and would never lose - while challengers and newbies would never be great.
But, as a trainer and competitor, you don't say things like that. Even if you think another fighter is better than or can beat your fighter, you just have to keep that thought to yourself. The fact that he said "Maybe" just shows that he wasn't confident that his fighter would win and there's nothing wrong with that, but to outright stated it like that to the public makes it blatantly obvious he wasn't confident of training Manny to beat Floyd five years ago. This isn't the first time that Roach has made a statement like this. There was another statement he made back then when he outright said they weren't ready for, Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostI don't think this will surprise anybody.
5 years ago I would have had this fight 95/5 in Mayweather's favour, he would have picked Manny apart. Now he is slower and his reflexes aren't what they were and its a close fight to call.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostWhat you talking about? So if very few Floyd fans say that Castillo beat Floyd then Castillo won? You will always get some who say different. The majority say otherwise.
BTW - Manny is 2-1-1 against Marquez and was also winning #4. Yes, you did just remind me of the other excuse Floyd fans make ..... but Floyd won the rematch!
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostArguably Manny won the first fight but due to an error it was ruled a draw. Fight 1 and 2 could have gone either way. Fight 3 was clearer to more people that Marquez was robbed and the 4th Pacquiao got knocked out. Floyd Castillo 1..... could have gone either way but Floyd got the nod like (Pacquiao/Marquez 1&2) but difference is Floyd convincingly beat Castillo the second time while Pacquiao could not.
3rd fight was close and the ringside observers were split 50/50.
Comment
Comment