Comments Thread For: Scully: Pacquiao Will Be A lot Meaner With Mayweather

[Build That Wall]

No you boys need to read more clearly. I never said he would beat him as easily as he did Marquez.

But it is possible that he could beat him just as easily, right?

[Gucci]

Manny gonna Decapitate Mayweather, simple as that.

[texasboi15]

im saying theres more to boxing than hit and not get hit. thats only one part of the game. a lot of fighters come out and fight, etc. not all fighters wants to be a defensive master is what im saying.

The essence of the sweet science is hit and don't get hit you fcking ******. This is the fundamental rule of boxing you dumb motherfcker. Anyone who argues that is not worth even debating. Boxing basics 101 you dumbfck.

You keep saying there's more to it but you're not giving examples you clown. Hit and don't get hit. Whatever examples you have yet to provide are secondary to that basic rule.

Argue that and you'll make yourself look ****** as fck.

Now give examples to support that dumb ass sht you're claiming.

[Evol]

The essence of the sweet science is hit and don't get hit you fcking ******. This is the fundamental rule of boxing you dumb motherfcker. Anyone who argues that is not worth even debating. Boxing basics 101 you dumbfck.

You keep saying there's more to it but you're not giving examples you clown. Hit and don't get hit. Whatever examples you have yet to provide are secondary to that basic rule.

Argue that and you'll make yourself look ****** as fck.

Now give examples to support that dumb ass sht you're claiming.

i just told u that some fighters come out and fight and not all fighters want to be a defensive fighter! the hit and not get hit is only one part of boxing. if hit and not get hit is boxing then we would see everyone trying to be like floyd.

[madsweeney]

The essence of the sweet science is hit and don't get hit you fcking ******. This is the fundamental rule of boxing you dumb motherfcker. Anyone who argues that is not worth even debating. Boxing basics 101 you dumbfck.

You keep saying there's more to it but you're not giving examples you clown. Hit and don't get hit. Whatever examples you have yet to provide are secondary to that basic rule.

Argue that and you'll make yourself look ****** as fck.

Now give examples to support that dumb ass sht you're claiming.

Get hit once, get KO'd and the rest doesn't matter. The idea of hit and not get hit is the general idea to achieve but it is not how fights actually happen.

You telling me if a fighter lands 15 jabs on and is only hit 3 times but one of those hits they're knocked down, he won the round? There's a reason most fighters emphasize offense, far easier to win a fight with a good offense and mediocre defense than the other way around.

[Pac=Duran]

Manny gonna Decapitate Mayweather, simple as that.

He's gonna piss all over his face before that dough.

[Johnwoo8686]

Makavelli i'm saying that this won't be his signature win. It's not a big is of a deal as it would've been if he beat him before those losses.

You said if he beats him "clearly and convincingly after beating the man who knocked him out" then followed up with "its expected in my eyes." That sounds like a triangle theory.

[Johnwoo8686]

Get hit once, get KO'd and the rest doesn't matter. The idea of hit and not get hit is the general idea to achieve but it is not how fights actually happen.

You telling me if a fighter lands 15 jabs on and is only hit 3 times but one of those hits they're knocked down, he won the round? There's a reason most fighters emphasize offense, far easier to win a fight with a good offense and mediocre defense than the other way around.

No that is NOT what he is saying. If a guy lands 15 jabs and the other guy lands 3 but doesn't get a knockdown then yes the guy who lands more punches wins.

[ICEMAN JOHN SCULLY]

You said if he beats him "clearly and convincingly after beating the man who knocked him out" then followed up with "its expected in my eyes." That sounds like a triangle theory.

Yup. I expect him to win. And Im saying I dont see beating Manny as his "career defining win"...at this point in time, MAYWEATHER beating Manny isnt as impressive as it would have been several years ago...it could be Marquez or anyone, Im saying for myself that beating a guy who lost a decision and was knocked out badly in recent years isnt as impressive as some of his other wins. If you think it is, that's very cool, Its fine, Its your opinion and I cant argue an opinion really. Its not enough to argue and fight about, I'll tell you that much LOL Not YOU in particular, I dont recall seeing you on here before, but just people in general, it seems like many people come to a message board to argue and fight about BOXING opinions? Why not just say, "Yeah? OK, cool. OK, Here's what I think about it." ????

[elishua F]

Triangle theories don't work. Styles make fights. You're basically inferring JMM is better than Pac man. Cliches but they hold true.

you can make a strong case marquez IS better than pac. first three fights controversial and toss ups, fourth fight pac gets his skull smashed.

why is it so crazy to think marquez is better. he proved it four times, pacquiao simply cannot figure him out.

and if triangle theories dont work why are pacquiao fan boys constantly bringing up the judah fight.