Cotto needs a good proponent for June...GGG is free

[Beater_of_ass]

Ask Floyd, he got away with it for 7 years with Manny. Now you're mad because Cotto was taking notes?

[bigjavi973]

Good post man.......

Im just keepin sh^t real. Man the sh^t I be reading sometimes, from all types of posters not just cotto... Like I was saying the sh^t posting in here is ******ed.

So many fights that can be made.... for a belt defense: GGG, Lara, (if lee-quillin somehow doesnt happen) lee, quillin

Non title defenses: NO WELTERWEIGHTS FFS!!!! Lara, k9 (ibf title/drop the 160 title) and boo boo

[Guest]

he has a legacy.

taking knees to marg.

couldn't hang with a former flyweight.

and his most triumphant moment. losing 10 rounds to floyd and idiot cotto fans claiming robbery.

oh and he beat a couple cripples.

--ok he got hit with plaster against margs (even though paul williams stood up to this plaster)
-- he was at a catchweight against the midget pacquiao.

- what excuse do they use for the trout fight? or do they just pretend it didn't happen.

[joesaiditstrue]

At a fight weight of 154.1 and no more. Rehydration clause wouldn't surprise me either.

if it's a mandatory defense, he doesn't get to set a "minimum weight", too bad for Miguel.

for reference, Canelo vs Floyd wasn't a mandatory, Cotto vs Martinez wasn't a mandatory, Margarito vs Pacquiao wasn't a mandatory

mandatory defenses aren't allowed to give the champion advantages like catchweights.

Cotto will vacate the title before the end of the year

[Guest]

if cotto gets a statue, tito needs to have the colony named after him.

u.s. dependency of puerto tito

Tito made B-Hop famous. B-Hop should be worshipping Tito too.

[Beater_of_ass]

if it's a mandatory defense, he doesn't get to set a "minimum weight", too bad for Miguel.

for reference, Canelo vs Floyd wasn't a mandatory, Cotto vs Martinez wasn't a mandatory, Margarito vs Pacquiao wasn't a mandatory

mandatory defenses aren't allowed to give the champion advantages like catchweights.

Cotto will vacate the title before the end of the year

Unless the WBC can get in a Floyd/Cotto rematch for the MW title, which is probably what will end up happening.

--ok he got hit with plaster against margs (even though paul williams stood up to this plaster)
-- he was at a catchweight against the midget pacquiao.

- what excuse do they use for the trout fight? or do they just pretend it didn't happen.

Excuses and reasons are different... Trout beat Cotto clearly, Roach even admits that. He's clearly a better fighter now, but if you want my "excuses" I don't think Cotto was mentally "up" to face Trout as he was Floyd and underestimated him greatly. Secondly, and this is well known, is that Cotto was overtraining with the Cuban. Running 8 miles a day, 6 days a week for example, so he had nothing for the fight. He clearly lost that fight, but that's why I think he did. Should they rematch, which I would like to see, Cotto would win clearly.

[JaguaresMx]

--ok he got hit with plaster against margs (even though paul williams stood up to this plaster)

I feel like a terrible human and massive troll for saying this, but I've always thought that Cotto fans are in a bind here:

If Margarito was a career cheater, then how come only Cotto took a knee? If those plasters were so powerful, then how come no one quit like Cotto?

But, if Margarito in fact only began cheating against Mosley, then he didn't cheat Cotto unless he specifically feared Cotto's chin? ....weird


Yes, neg. rep me. Whatever, Cotto holding the belt hostage from The Champ is lame.

[Beater_of_ass]

I feel like a terrible human and massive troll for saying this, but I've always thought that Cotto fans are in a bind here:

If Margarito was a career cheater, then how come only Cotto took a knee? If those plasters were so powerful, then how come no one quit like Cotto?

But, if Margarito in fact only began cheating against Mosley, then he didn't cheat Cotto unless he specifically feared Cotto's chin? ....weird


Yes, neg. rep me. Whatever, Cotto holding the belt hostage from The Champ is lame.

But if Margarito said he didn't feel anything different in his wraps between the Mosley and Cotto fights, he would have admitting to not knowing how long he was using them. And, on my gosh, Margarito actually said that :O

[Guest]

I feel like a terrible human and massive troll for saying this, but I've always thought that Cotto fans are in a bind here:

If Margarito was a career cheater, then how come only Cotto took a knee? If those plasters were so powerful, then how come no one quit like Cotto?

But, if Margarito in fact only began cheating against Mosley, then he didn't cheat Cotto unless he specifically feared Cotto's chin? ....weird


Yes, neg. rep me. Whatever, Cotto holding the belt hostage from The Champ is lame.

That was quite the career resurrection for Cotto beating Sergio. I think he won't hold the belt hostage that long to be honest. Cotto seems like he just wants to make a huge payday then maybe do his promotions.

I think he knows a Bundrage, Rios, or Bradley fight would probably bomb. I'd be surprised if any of the three got made unless of course those guys take seriously short money.

[Mr.Fantastic]

Unless the WBC can get in a Floyd/Cotto rematch for the MW title, which is probably what will end up happening.



Excuses and reasons are different... Trout beat Cotto clearly, Roach even admits that. He's clearly a better fighter now, but if you want my "excuses" I don't think Cotto was mentally "up" to face Trout as he was Floyd and underestimated him greatly. Secondly, and this is well known, is that Cotto was overtraining with the Cuban. Running 8 miles a day, 6 days a week for example, so he had nothing for the fight. He clearly lost that fight, but that's why I think he did. Should they rematch, which I would like to see, Cotto would win clearly.

Spoken like a true hugger.