Gennedy Golovkin is the undisputed greatest middle weight ever

[sicko]

LMFAO these same fans are the first to turn around and call everybody else a "HYPE JOB" and "OVERRATED" but when it comes to someone they like...."******ITY IS ACCEPTABLE"

Can tell most of you are little kids are very immature grown men

[Muh Du-rag]

He could have fought Ward already. They don't want any parts of Andre Ward.

Ward's been out of action for 1.5 years and said he needs 3 tuneups before he gets in there with GGG.

If he's allowed to clinch (Cheat) down in Oakland he'll win, in a fair fight GGG will chop him down.

[just the facts]

Let's take the thread question and present it a slightly different way.. More like a statement...

"AS IF! Any of these ancient boxers are better than Gennady Golovkin."

Okay so a few are competitive, but they are confined to the very recent.. And physically larger fighters anyway!

Sorry but Hagler don't really cut the mustard.

And you can take that Robinson crap and **** RIGHT off back to History section!

are f*%cking ******? Hagler destroys GGG. Either by stoppage or lopsided beat down

[just the facts]

Whenever someone starts a truly ignorant post like this, I try to remind everyone that as good as GGG looks, Donald Curry looked better and how did that turn out? GGG might actually be a quality fighter, but I've seen nothing from him (especially this weekend) that leads me to believe he could ever be considered the best MW ever.

[The Problem Child]

are f*%cking ******? Hagler destroys GGG. Either by stoppage or lopsided beat down

Get real you bum. Hagler doesn't survive 12 rounds with GGG. Neither does Hearns.

Golovkin is stronger, has better conditioning and chin than both. He would stop of them and make them look like the damn overrated **** they are. You people need to stop living in the past and putting fighters on a pedestal just because they are old school. Get ****ing real.

[hugh grant]

Im not sure hes the greatest in terms of having the best resume ever. But I think he would beat Hagler and SRR at middleweight.

I mean, success against GGG is lasting the distance with him, that's how you measure success against him. Murray had a very successful night as he lasted longer than anyone else ever did.

So if Hagler fought GGG, his victory would be lasting 12 rounds with him, whilst losing a wide decision. Its unlikely Hagler would kill two birds with one stone, ie going the distance and getting a decision.

[BTL]

at 160, no one in history beats him.

[SkillspayBills]

This thread......is very revealing. You know who is a fanboy and who actually watches the sport.

[Lords]

How can anyone say GGG is the greatest when the middle weight division today is God awful and he has yet to defeat an elite fighter? I mean, why are people so quick to judge here? This reminds me of when Lucas finished off Peterson and all the fan boys talked like Lucas was this unbeatable boxing God. after Garcia finished him off, the hype went down the toilet. I expect this to happen with GGG.

[Interloper]

If he's undisputed, what's all the fighting about?